Skip to content

Kris Kobach: Border Surge of Potentially 1M Illegal Aliens ‘Guaranteed’ Following DACA Amnesty

January 16, 2018

John Binder

1/15/2018

Source …..

A surge of illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border that could reach up to one million border-crossings is “guaranteed” following a possible amnesty for nearly 800,000 illegal aliens, says Kansas Secretary of State and gubernatorial candidate Kris Kobach.

In an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Sunday, hosted by Breitbart News Political Editor Matt Boyle and Deputy Political Editor Amanda House, Kobach warned President Trump against negotiating a deal wherein illegal aliens shielded from deportation by the President Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program are given amnesty, saying such a plan would trigger a massive border surge.

KOBACH: And there will be a surge, it is guarenteed. If there is a DACA amnesty, there will be a massive surge of hundreds of thousands, if not more than a million, new illegal aliens.

HOUSE: Right, we saw that in the ’80’s and the ’90’s, as well, following the 1986 amnesty.

KOBACH: That’s exactly right. And as some Breitbart readers may know, if they’ve seen my piece this week, I put some statistics in there. Yeah, that ’86 amnesty, it ended up being for 2.7 million people which was a larger number than was expected by Congress and by President Reagan’s administration when it happened. And the reason its a larger number is its estimated that about 700,000 people came in or applied for the amnesty who were not eligible for it. And so… what happens when you grant amnesty is immediately people flood across the border because they want to falsely claim that they were already here and get the new amnesty or they want to at least get here and wait for the next amnesty.

An amnesty for DACA illegal aliens has the potential to trigger a border surge that could triple the current level of border-crossings, which under President Trump, have ticked back up to Obama-era levels due to border wall construction being stalled in the prototype stage for months.

As the Migration Policy Institute has chronicled, previous border surges from amnesty programs have brought hundreds of thousands across the U.S.-Mexico border:

While the flow of Unaccompanied Alien Children (UACs) has been climbing steadily since 2012, a dramatic surge has taken place in the last six months, with the Rio Grande Valley in South Texas as the principal place of entry. The Border Patrol there has converted entire stations to house unaccompanied minors and families.

According to the Border Patrol, apprehensions of unaccompanied children increased from 16,067 in fiscal year (FY) 2011 to 24,481 in FY 2012 and 38,833 in FY 2013. During the first eight months of FY 2014, 47,017 such children were apprehended by the Border Patrol. If the influx continues apace—and it shows no signs of slowing—the administration predicts that by the end of the fiscal year on September 30, totals could reach 90,000.

Ninety-eight percent of unaccompanied minors currently arriving at the border are from Honduras (28 percent), Mexico (25 percent), Guatemala (24 percent), and El Salvador (21 percent). This breakdown represents a significant shift: prior to 2012, more than 75 percent of UACs were from Mexico.

In recent days, Trump has said that negotiations for a DACA amnesty — that would include cutting legal immigration levels to benefit America’s workers and immediately constructing the border wall — are “probably dead” due to Democrats’ unwillingness to cut legal immigration and bar employers from hiring illegal aliens over U.S. citizens.

Listen to the full Breitbart News Sunday interview here:

Advertisements

The new word of the week accurately describes California

January 16, 2018

Katy Grimes

1/15/2018

Source …..

Despite so-called “progressives” promising their policies will create a Soviet-style worker’s paradise, California’s leftist Democrats have turned the once Golden State into a sh*thole through decades of leftist policies penalizing and demonizing employers, businesses, property owners, innovators, entrepreneurs—and really, anyone who wants to work hard and get ahead. These hard working people are responding by fleeing liberal California for conservative red states.

The perception across America is that California is the state people are leaving. And that perception is accurate.

More than 1,000 people each day are leaving leftist sh*thole blue states and moving to red states. “This migration is changing the economic center of gravity in America—moving it relentlessly to the South and West,” according to economist Stephen Moore. “California is one of the oil- and gas-richest states in the nation,” which should mean a mass inbound migration, “but its ‘green’ politicians are regulating that industry out of businesses. So much for caring about working-class Americans,” Moore says.

Even the Tech industry isn’t a growth business in California any longer. Cities With Fastest Growth In STEM Jobs Are Far From Silicon Valley, according to demographer Joel Kotkin. “In some recent months in parts of the Bay Area, The San Jose Mercury reports, the tech job count has actually declined. One limiting factor could be high housing costs. A recent report from the state Legislative Analyst’s Office showed that many CEOs, particularly in Silicon Valley, regard severe housing unaffordability—where you need to earn more than $200,000 annually to buy a median-priced house—as their biggest business challenge.”

And why is that? millennials, the fuel for tech firms, also may not be as urban-centric as some have predicted. Their numbers have recently dropped or plateaued in the much-celebrated core cities of Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York after rising earlier in the decade. In contrast, many Sun Belt areas—Nashville, Charlotte, Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth, Austin, Orlando—enjoy stronger net population growthin those between 25 and 34 than coastal California and the Northeast. California’s problem is not just people leaving, but talented young people not coming here who, years ago during our better days, streamed in.

My own millennial son, a Naval officer, recently transferred bases from San Diego to Virginia, and said he wished he’d made the move a few years ago. While not exactly a super low-tax state (but ranked 31 in the Tax Foundation’s 2018 State Business Tax Climate Index, Virginia is much better off than CA’s 48th ranking), cost of living, open carry laws, and general non-California people and attitudes contributed greatly to his opinion. He spent his first 18 months out of the Naval Academy in northern Florida, and appreciated the low-tax, business friendly state so much, he’s maintained his residency there.

California’s Economic Forecast is Dismal

According to the 10th Edition of Rich States, Poor States: ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index for 2017, California ranks 47th in economic outlook. Why?

  • Top Marginal Personal Income Tax Rate rank = 50
  • Top Marginal Corporate Income Tax Rate = 40
  • Personal Income Tax Progressivity = 50
  • Sales Tax Burden = 33
  • State Liability System Survey = 47
  • State Minimum Wage = 48
  • Absolute Domestic Migration = 49
  • Average Workers’ Compensation Costs = 50
  • Right-to-Work State? (No) = 50

The ALEC report was for 2017. Since the report was published in April, California’s lawmakers and governor have been hard at work further destroying the economic outlook for the state.

Most recently, the state Public Utilities Commission’s decided to close Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, marking the end of more than a half-century of nuclear power generation in the state. This will only serve to dramatically increase our energy costs, which are already the highest in the nation. Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration showed California households paying 17.97 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity, or 40.9 percent more than the national average of 12.75 cents, CNBC reported.

Governor Jerry Brown wants to ban the sale of gas and diesel powered cars in California. There are 26 million drivers in California. More than 2 million new vehicles were registered in California last year, the most of any state, and only 5% of California’s new vehicle sales in the first quarter of 2017 were electric vehicles, Forbes reported. In total, only about 300,000 cars in California are “clean vehicles,” and only .4% are electric vehicles. I also beg to differ on California’s definition of “clean vehicles”—my Eco-diesel Jeep is extremely clean, but doesn’t count as a “clean vehicle.”

“To achieve Brown’s goals, he will have to compel 99.6 percent of California drivers to trade in their gas guzzlers for electric vehicles that they currently find too expensive or too impractical,” Christian Britschgi wrote at Reason’s Hit & Run blog. “And that doesn’t even touch on the issue of providing enough charging stations for these vehicles, or of generating enough electricity to power those stations.”

Britschgi points out that electric vehicles are mostly owned by California’s wealthy. “A 2016 Berkeley study found that 83 percent of those making use of California’s electric vehicle subsidy program made over $100,000.”

California isn’t Norway, which is the world leader on using electric cars. And that is because it’s freezing cold and frozen in Norway, which relies almost entirely on hydroelectric power. Um, with our Mediterranean-like climate, warm, dry summers and mild, wet winters, California isn’t Norway. And the leftists in California hate hydroelectric power anyway.

Stay tuned for Part ll of How California Democrats Have Turned The Golden State Into A ‘Sh*thole’later this week.

 

Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen Slams Federal Judge’s ‘Offensive’ Comments, Declares DACA Unconstitutional

January 16, 2018

Ken Klukowski

1/15/2018

Source …..

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen on Sunday criticized a federal judge’s order reinstating DACA as offensive for suggesting that ending DACA is racist. She went on to declare DACA unconstitutional, and unapologetically asserted that her oath of office is to follow the U.S. Constitution.

Nielsen appeared on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, discussing various issues the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is dealing with. A large part of the interview concerned the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which is an amnesty program for 800,000 illegal aliens announced by President Barack Obama and developed by former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

DACA was the predecessor of DAPA, a larger amnesty program based on the same legal argument which covered four million illegal aliens. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that DAPA was illegal, and once President Donald Trump was inaugurated and Attorney General Jeff Sessions confirmed, the federal government dropped the remaining legal appeals and let the larger program lapse.

Supporters of DACA filed suit to keep the smaller program going, asserting that the Trump administration violated the law by ending the program, presenting legal arguments that have never before been adopted by a federal court.

Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California—a well-known liberal judge appointed to the bench by President Bill Clinton—agreed with those novel arguments.

In his preliminary injunction ordering DHS to resume DACA immediately, Alsup wrote that he found “a plausible inference that racial animus towards Mexicans and Latinos was a motivating factor in the decision to end DACA.”

Secretary Nielsen did not appreciate the implication that federal officials at DHS are racist.

“With respect to the quote, I find that offensive on its face,” Nielsen said. “I took an oath when I became secretary of homeland security to defend and support the Constitution.”

“The program was unconstitutional,” she declared, consistent with the Fifth Circuit’s decision that the similarly named DAPA amnesty was illegal.

Only Congress can change immigration law. Yet DAPA and DACA did so through executive fiat. Contrary to the claims of California Attorney General Xavier Becerra during that same broadcast, neither program ever went through the legal process required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). That was one reason the federal appeals court struck down DAPA.

Immigration security is a longtime focus for Nielsen, who took over DHS with more background in securing the homeland than any of her predecessors. She has been working in D.C. since graduating from Georgetown and later the elite law school at the University of Virginia.

Under President George W. Bush, Nielsen served on the White House Homeland Security Council. She also established the Office of Legislative Policy and Government Affairs at the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which is a component of DHS.

She went to the private sector during the Obama administration, but continued working on security issues. She worked at George Washington University on the Resilience Task Force at the university’s Center for Cyber & Homeland Security, as well as at the World Economic Forum on its Global Risks Report Advisory Board.

Nielsen worked on President Donald Trump’s presidential transition team. She then served as chief of staff at DHS, then as principal deputy White House chief of staff, until she was confirmed in December 2017 as the sixth Secretary of Homeland Security.

 

Jon Voight, Alveda King making pro-life Roe v Wade film

January 16, 2018

NaturalNews

1/12/2018

Source …..

The Left are going to lose their minds over this one: a film project is in the works to tell the story of Roe v. Wade, depicting the landmark abortion case from a pro-life perspective.

(Article by Alex Parker republished from TruthRevolt.org)

The endeavor is being funded in part via Indiegogo, the webpage of which  that the full-length feature Roe v Wade: The Untold Story will tell the tale of “most corrupt court case in history.”

Could it get any worse for the Left?

Yes — it could, and it does: Academy Award-winning actor and outspoken Trump supporter Jon Voight is signed on. As if that weren’t bad enough, executive producer for the project is Alveda King. That would be “King,” as in bulletproof Democratic icon “Martin Luther.” Alveda is MLK’s niece.

The pro-abortion Left won’t appreciate the film’s premise.  to LifeNews:

This is the untold story of how [abortion activists] lied and manipulated Jane Roe, the media, and the courts into the decision to allow abortion in 1973.

[…]

The film also will address the racism intertwined in the abortion industry through Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger and others, and [Dr. Mildred] Jefferson’s fight for unborn babies as well as people of color.

Jefferson was the first African American woman to graduate from Harvard Medical School.

As  by King in the project’s promotional video:

“This big-screen movie is the real untold story of how mountains of lies led to an injustice that has deprived millions of people of human dignity and human rights.”

Voight will play a U.S. Supreme Court justice, and Ms. King will have a cameo role.

View the video in its entirety below.

Read more at: TruthRevolt.org

 

Uranium One Indictment Unsealed By DOJ

January 15, 2018

Tim Brown

1/13/2018

Source …..

On Friday, the Justice Department unsealed an 11-count indictment concerning the Uranium One scandal.  Sadly, it did not include former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, but rather former DoD intelligence analyst-turned uranium transportation executive Mark Lambert of Mount Airy, Maryland.

Lambert, 54, was charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and to commit wire fraud, seven counts of violating the FCPA, two counts of wire fraud and one count of international promotion money laundering.  The charges stem from an alleged scheme to bribe Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official at JSC Techsnabexport (TENEX), a subsidiary of Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation and the sole supplier and exporter of Russian Federation uranium and uranium enrichment services to nuclear power companies worldwide, in order to secure contracts with TENEX.

According to the DOJ:

According to the indictment, beginning at least as early as 2009 and continuing until October 2014, Lambert conspired with others at “Transportation Corporation A” to make corrupt and fraudulent bribery and kickback payments to offshore bank accounts associated with shell companies, at the direction of, and for the benefit of, a Russian official, Vadim Mikerin, in order to secure improper business advantages and obtain and retain business with TENEX.   In order to effectuate and conceal the corrupt and fraudulent bribe payments, Lambert and others allegedly caused fake invoices to be prepared, purportedly from TENEX to Transportation Corporation A, that described services that were never provided, and then Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to wire the corrupt payments for those purported services to shell companies in Latvia, Cyprus and Switzerland.  Lambert and others also allegedly used code words like “lucky figures,” “LF,” “lucky numbers,” and “cake” to describe the payments in emails to the Russian official at his personal email account.  The indictment also alleges that Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to overbill TENEX by building the cost of the corrupt payments into their invoices, and TENEX thus overpaid for Transportation Corporation A’s services.

In June 2015, Lambert’s former co-president, Daren Condrey, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and commit wire fraud, and Vadim Mikerin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering involving violations of the FCPA.  Mikerin is currently serving a sentence of 48 months in prison and Condrey is awaiting sentencing.  The indictment includes allegations against Lambert based on his role in effectuating the criminal scheme with Condrey, Mikerin, and others.

Back in October 2017, The Hill reported that the FBI had uncovered a Russian bribery plot before the Obama administration approved the controversial nuclear deal with Moscow.

“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials.”

Indictment Affidavit by M Mali on Scribd

https://www.scribd.com/document/361782806/Indictment-Affidavit

Zero Hedge adds:

Based on what the FBI knew – including evidence which purportedly includes a video of Russians preparing briefcases of bribe money – the Uranium One deal never should have gone through. Moreover, both Robert Mueller and current deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein were directly involved – and current Attorney General Jeff Sessions and other Justice Department officials appear to be covering for them.

In short, the FBI had ample evidence of the Russian bribery plot before the Obama administration approved the Uranium One deal thanks to their embedded mole in the Russian nuclear industry. 

The informant – outed as energy consultant William Campbell – was “threatened” by Obama admin AG Loretta Lynch to keep quiet with an iron-clad gag order, according to his attorney – former Reagan Justice Dept. official and former Chief Counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee Victoria Toensing. After Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-VA) demanded Campbell be allowed to testify in front of Congress, the gag order was lifted.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions originally tried to claim that there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear transport bribery case, however several congressional republicans pushed back:

Attorney General Sessions seemed to say that the bribery, racketeering and money laundering offenses involving Tenex’s Vadim Mikerin occurred after the approval of the Uranium One deal by the Obama administration. But we know that the FBI’s confidential informant was actively compiling incriminating evidence as far back as 2009,” Rep. Ron DeSantis, (R-Fla.) told The Hill.

“It is hard to fathom how such a transaction could have been approved without the existence of the underlying corruption being disclosed. I hope AG Sessions gets briefed about the CI and gives the Uranium One case the scrutiny it deserves,” added DeSantis, whose House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittees is one of the investigating panels.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) sent a similar rebuke last week to Rosenstein, saying the deputy attorney general’s first response to the committee “largely missed the point” of the congressional investigations.

“The essential question is whether the Obama Justice Department provided notice of the criminal activity of certain officials before the CFIUS approval of the Uranium One deal and other government decisions that enabled the Russians to trade nuclear materials in the U.S,” Grassley scolded.”

Meanwhile, journalists John Solomon and journalist Sara Carter claim to have copies of the FBI informant’s evidence, while Carter issued an explosive report in late November laying out the players, the timeline, and the evidence at hand.

“By the time the sale of Uranium One was approved by the Obama Administration, the FBI’s investigators had already gathered substantial evidence and the bureau was also aware of Russia’s intentions to enter the U.S. energy market and its desire to purchase a stake in American uranium,” Carter writes.

Highlights: 

  • FBI mole William Campbell was a highly valued FBI asset – paid $51,000 by FBI officials at a celebration dinner in Chrystal City, VA, where Campbell’s attorney says they thanked him for his service.
  • Campbell was required by the Russians, under threat, to launder large sums of money – which allowed the FBI to uncover a massive Russian “nuclear money laundering apparatus
  • Campbell collected over 5,000 documents and briefs over a six year period
  • Campbell uncovered a Russian plot to penetrate the Obama administration and gain approval for the Uranium One sale, including a 2010 email which describes “Russia’s intent on expanding its Uranium expansion in the United States.”

This is not just about bribery and kickbacks but about a U.S. company that was transporting yellow-cake for the Russians with our approval,” an unnamed U.S. Intelligence official told Carter, adding “This should raise serious questions. At the time everyone was concerned about Russia’s ties to Iran, we still are. And of course, Russia’s intentions and reach into the U.S. energy market.”

Former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who chaired the House Intelligence Committee during the time the FBI probe was being conducted, told The Hill, “Not providing information on a corruption scheme before the Russian uranium deal was approved by U.S. regulators and engage appropriate congressional committees has served to undermine U.S. national security interests by the very people charged with protecting them.  The Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise is breathtaking.”

Not so fast.  This was not the “Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise.”  It was Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah and Hillary Clinton, traitors to America, who facilitated this and signed off on it.  When will we see those indictments?

DACA Amnesty Restarts Under Judge’s Order, But Appeal Expected

January 15, 2018

Neil Munro

1/13/2018

Source …..

The Department of Homeland Security says it will follow a judge’s order to restart the President Barack Obama’s ‘DACA’ amnesty and will renew work-permits given to 15,000 illegal immigrants.

The statement was released late Saturday night, but the statement did not say if the 15,000 ‘DACA’ illegals whose work permits have expired since September will actually get renewed permits before the administration’s lawyers can get through the legal process needed before the Supreme Court can countermand the judge’s order.

To block the judge’s order, the administration first must file an appeal with the California-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeals court is expected to support the judge and reject the administration’s appeal. Once the appeal is denied, White House lawyers can ask the nine-member Supreme Court to countermand the orders from the appeals court and the subordinate judge.

According to the agency:

Jan. 13, 2018, Update:  Due to a federal court order, USCIS has resumed accepting requests to renew a grant of deferred action under DACA.  Until further notice, and unless otherwise provided in this guidance, the DACA policy will be operated on the terms in place before it was rescinded on Sept. 5, 2017.

The declaration may give Democrats the political opportunity to back away from their unpopular threat to shut down the federal government’s 2018 budget unless the GOP Congress and President Donald Trump provide citizenship to at least 3.25 million illegals — and also to millions of chain-migration relatives.

Starting March 5, roughly 1,000 young illegals are expected to lose their DACA work permits each day, opening up hundreds of additional jobs for American workers during the run-up to the November midterm election.

The judge’s decision, issued January 9, said the administration had not followed proper procedures for ending the benefits to illegals granted by Obama’s policy of offering work-permits to younger illegal immigrants who say they were brought into the United States as children by their illegal immigrant parents. Administration lawyers argued that Obama’s policy was illegal and that all required procedures were followed.

Obama’s amnesty was created despite federal law which bars work-permits for illegal immigrants.

A related amnesty for the illegal-immigrant parents of children born in the United States was also struck down by a Texas judge. That decision was later affirmed by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is based in New Orleans. The issue then went to the Supreme Court, but the sudden death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia allowed the four progressive justices on the court to block the top court from confirming the Texas judge’s decision.

Since then, President Donald Trump and the GOP Senate have approved a replacement justice, Neil Gorsuch. His vote is likely to provide a majority in the Supreme Court against the Obama amnesty.

 

The WAR on WHITEY: Schools and colleges are now teaching children to believe that being born white makes you a bad person

January 15, 2018

1/14/2018

Source …..

Parents of school-age children in Wisconsin are making their grievances known about the latest onslaught of racist curriculum to creep into the state’s public “education” system. According to reports, eighth-graders in West Bend, a northwest suburb of Milwaukee, are apparently now being taught that they’re bad people if their skin color is white, or if their families have two parents of the opposite sex who are still married.

During a recent segment on “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” host Tucker Carlson explained that students attending schools in the West Bend area, which is predominantly white, are being given so-called “privilege tests” during class that identify being white and having an intact family as representing undue “privilege” in society. Students who fall into either or both of these categories are basically being shamed by their teachers and told that they’re inherently racist, while black and brown students are being told that they’re victims who deserve special treatment in society.

Many parents are understandably outraged that this is taking place under the guise of “education” – and with their hard-earned tax dollars. Most 12- and 13-year-olds are too young to even understand race, let alone made-up liberal concepts like “white privilege.” And yet, they’re now being subjected to this child abuse under the auspices of “public education.

Liberal ‘psychologist’ says it’s good to psychologically abuse young white boys because that prevents them from growing up and becoming rapists

The individual who tried to defend the “privilege tests,” a “liberal psychologist,” told Carlson that she believes it’s important to psychologically abuse white children – and especially white male children – because doing so prevents “horrible crimes committed [against] humanity.” She claims that, if little boys are allowed to succeed in life, they will only end up obtaining high-level positions at companies, giving them the opportunity to rape women.

Such insanity is taking place at many other schools as well, including at the University of Michigan where a “whiteness” conference was recently held to make white students feel bad about being white. Kennesaw State University in Georgia also has an anti-white bias, as this indoctrination center recently decided it would be a good idea to segregate white students from “students of color.”

But where would our country be without white men? It certainly wouldn’t be a First World nation of opportunity, according to Ed Brodow from Lifezette. He recently wrote how America’s entire value system and success as a nation largely stems from the “achievement of white people, especially white men.”

“White men founded our republic,” he adds. “White men gave their lives to end slavery. Today, whites are largely responsible for the day-to-day commerce of this country. Many black teenagers hold themselves back, in contrast, by deliberately rejecting the values on which this country was founded. Self-destructive behavior by many – not white privilege – is ruining the lives of millions.”

It’s all part of a much larger anti-white agenda – one that leftist extremists are using to divide the country and create chaos. Should it continue without being nipped in the bud, much worse times are coming, at least for white people – and white males specifically – who will increasingly become the targets of politically-correct racism, which is the only kind of racism that’s tolerated in America today.

“The payoff for the Left’s diversity and multicultural agenda is stoking racial discord,” Brodow adds.

“Minority special-interest groups are using the banners of ‘equality,’ ‘diversity,’ and ‘social justice’ as a power grab. The intention is to impose their agenda on the white majority. It is a fight for equality only in the Orwellian sense … We are observing a grab for power by vocal minority groups that want to be more equal than others. Look out. If they succeed, they will institutionalize the inquisition.”

Sources for this article include:

 

The folks who wear vagina hats and call us ‘teabaggers’ are offended by Trump’s vulgarity

January 15, 2018

Matt Walsh

1/12/2015

Source …..

You have no doubt heard about the latest Donald Trump Outrage. It is reported that Trump, during negotiations over the immigration deal, referred to certain African countries and Haiti as “s***hole countries.” He then asked, allegedly, “why we need more Haitians” to come here as immigrants.

The White House rather noticeably refused to deny these reports at first. Finally, this morning, Trump issued a vague denial, claiming that he used “tough language” but “this was not the language used.” So it seems apparent that he either said “s***hole” or something similar to it.

Predictably, the Left, the media, and some on the Right have been, shall we say, extremely displeased with the president. CNN went to full on Apocalyptic Freak Out Mode, calling Trump a “s***hole” on air, and declaring him racist. These were news anchors, by the way, making these unbiased proclamations. A law professor at Yale even suggested that Trump could be impeached for his salty language because he committed “an offense against the spirit animating the Reconstruction Amendments.” And on and on it goes. You know the drill by now.

Here is what I’ll say about the whole thing. Three points:

1) The Left obviously is in no position to lecture anyone for “vulgar and offensive” language. These are the same people who spent eight years calling their political opponents “teabaggers.” “S***hole” is a PG-13 term. “Teabagger” is X-rated. It’s also a personal attack on actual people, as opposed to an attack on the general conditions of a country. And let’s not forget the time they donned vagina hats and marched through the streets with signs referring rather explicitly to their “p*ssies.” I could go on at great length citing examples of the gleeful vulgarity that has spewed from the mouths of the people now so scandalized by the “s” word.

I’ve seen many on the Left lament that Trump has “coarsened the culture” to such an extent that our children can’t even watch the news anymore. A reporter for the Washington Post worried that “s***hole” will be “all over the schoolyard tomorrow” because our kids will have learned of the term, for the first time, from Donald Trump.

I agree that the culture is too coarse and our children are too exposed to it. But “s**t” is the least of our problems, I’m afraid to say. Your child is far more scandalized by the pop songs you let her listen to all day than she is by the words the president uses in a closed door meeting at the White House. Yet if I were to point out that pop music is inappropriate, you’d scoff at me and call me a Puritan. Something doesn’t add up here.

I grew up during the Clinton years. I was not allowed to be in the room when my Dad watched the news; precautions that, sadly, had little effect. I still heard all about Clinton’s vulgar exploits in school the next day. Before I graduated elementary school I had learned about dress stains and creative uses for cigars, among other tidbits. “S***hole” would have been laughably tame compared to the moral corruption I suffered as a young boy thanks to the degenerates these Leftists, with their virgin ears, placed in the White House.

2) I don’t think Trump’s comments were racist, and I don’t think the point he was making was particularly incredible or shocking. In his untactful way, he seemed to be communicating two facts: First, that third world countries are dilapidated and miserable. “S***hole” is an uncharitable way of referring to them, but there is no pleasant way to describe a nation like Haiti. Would “hellhole” be better? Whatever word you use, the point remains. These are awful places.

Second, our immigration system should favor those immigrants who will add something useful to society. The media can faint like wilting flowers all they want, but a great many people in the United States agree with the president. They see that we are deep in debt, the Welfare State is bankrupting our children, our cities are overrun with crime and poverty, and they do not want to import immigrants who will contribute to any of those problems. White or black or in between. The race is not the concern here. The concern is far more practical and logical, and it’s exactly the concern that should be primary for the President of the United States.

I believe that we should reach out and help the poor and unfortunate. But we cannot invite all of them here to live with us, because, after a while, we will become just like the places they left. My family does what it can to help the homeless in our community, but we have never welcomed them into our house to sleep in the guest bedroom. That’s because our first job is to protect our own children. We must help the less fortunate in a way that does not jeopardize our ability to perform our first and most essential duty. This really is not a radical concept.

3) With all of this said, the real issue still remains: the immigration deal itself. The irony is that liberals may well get an immigration deal they want, but they’ll still be angry because of the language Trump used. And conservatives may be backstabbed in the deal, but they won’t notice because they’ll be too busy defending Trump’s language. Both parties would do well to keep their eyes on the real prize. And conservatives should not allow themselves to be so swept off their feet by Trump’s un-PC approach that they let him get away with betraying his campaign promises.

 

Texas AG Confirms Investigation Into Alleged Violation of Sanctuary City Law

January 13, 2018

Bob Price

1/12/2018

Source …..

The Texas Office of the Attorney General (OAG) confirmed to Breitbart Texas that it is conducting an investigation into a possible violation of the state’s new sanctuary city law by San Antonio Police Chief William McManus. The investigation could lead to a criminal prosecution under the SB4 anti-sanctuary city law passed in the 2017 legislative session.

“Our office has received multiple complaints alleging that the San Antonio police chief violated Senate Bill 4, the Texas law prohibiting sanctuary city policies that the attorney general has authority to enforce,” OAG spokesman Mark Rylander said in response to an inquiry from Breitbart Texas. “We have begun our investigation and demanded that the San Antonio Police Department preserve all of its records relating to the incident.”

The AG Ken Paxton’s office also sent a letter to the City of San Antonio demanding the preservation of any evidence that might be related to the case.

“Several citizens have filed complaints with the Texas Attorney General’s Office regarding an incident on December 23 involving the release of numerous suspected illegal aliens,” Assistant Texas Attorney General Cleve W. Doty wrote in the letter (attached below) which is also addressed to the San Antonio Police Department,  City Council, City Manager Sheryl Sculley, City Attorney Andy Segovia, Mayor Ron Nirenberg, and Police Chief William McManus.

“The Texas Attorney General’s Office will investigate these complaints and the procedure in Senate Bill 4 contemplates litigation,” Doty continued. “We demand that you affirmatively preserve all relevant materials.”

The AG’s office is asking for records of all of the officers involved in the incident, any recordings of the incident, office and personal phone records of Chief McManus, his assistants, and the officers involved in the incident, and any orders Chief McManus gave to any subordinate officer regarding the incident or the illegal immigrants.

The letter demands written confirmation by Monday, January 15.

“This letter serves to warn you of your duty to preserve all relevant information pending an imminent, statutorily-mandated investigation,” Doty concluded in the letter.

In May 2017, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed the nation’s toughest law prohibiting local police from interfering with immigration law enforcement.

“All law enforcement officers are going to be required to follow this law,” Governor Abbott told Breitbart Texas in an exclusive interview immediately after signing the SB4 bill into law. “If they refuse to follow this law, or if they adopt sanctuary city policies, they are subject now to the stiffest penalties in America for adopting sanctuary city policies – which includes jail time where sheriffs could wind up in the same jail they may be releasing inmates from who are the subject of ICE detainer requests.”

The law provides both civil and criminal penalties for city and law enforcement officials who violate the law.

It appears this will be the first investigation by the Texas OAG into potential violations of the State’s new law.

“We finally have a higher authority looking into the chief’s conduct,” San Antonio Police Officers Association President Mike Helle told Breitbart Texas on Thursday morning. “That is a good thing.”

Helle said there are several discrepancies between the information being handed out by Police Chief William McManus and what officers on the ground witnessed. “The staffs of our state’s leaders listened closely to what our officers had to say,” Helle explained. “They were not happy at all with what they heard.”

 

Leftist Liberals Infected With Dangerous Mind-Altering Disease – Trumpaphobia

January 13, 2018

Greg Holt

1/12/2018

Source …..

(The Olive) Trumpaphobia: noun – an extreme or irrational fear of, or aversion to, Donald Trump (source)

  • A fear of Donald Trump… (source)

It never ceases to amaze me, actually it has ceased to amaze me, the depths the Left will go to in order to attack and make President Trump look bad. Just as the media out-right lies about how the American people just love Obama and Hillary, so too the media constantly lies about how America hates Trump.

The Liberal Left is so unhinged over the Trump presidency it’s amazing any of these mental midgets can function at all. Actually that is too harsh – the Left does indeed function well, they pat themselves on the back as being America’s champions, they decry anything the Conservatives believe in and represent it as evil to the American people, and they thrive on any and all things that bring about chaos and destruction in the U.S. Just check out cities and states run by Democrats to verify my claims here.

There is no action too low, too corrupt, too dirty, or mean-spirited that the Demoncrats won’t engage in to bring Trump down.

The infamous Trump dossier, plan A to derail the Trump Presidency – a completely fabricated package of lies likely used as the springboard to open the Mueller investigation. Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid for this so-called research to be done by Fusion GPS who in turn hired a former MI6 agent with a wild imagination and a lust for a large juicy payout.

The Mueller investigation into Trump collusion with the Russians. This so-called investigation is nothing more than a witch-hunt against Trump, just another attempt to discredit and bring down Trump. This “investigation” along with the Trump dossier may well be the insurance policy the FBI is now on the hot seat for. Mueller’s investigation has turned up zero evidence of Trump colluding with Russia; let me say that again, zero evidence. This is a fishing expedition with no end in sight costing Americans millions of dollars while the very ones doing the investigating are the ones covering up mega crimes they themselves committed!

The FBI and DOJ collusion against Donald Trump. While no evidence has been turned up of improper actions on the part of Trump, there has been a lot of evidence coming out about the criminal wrong doing by the FBI and the DOJ. Not the rank and file of these two agencies, but rather the upper echelon – to wit:

  1. The meeting between then Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the airport tarmac with Bill Clinton – but that was only about golf and grandkids.
  2. James Comey’s exoneration letter for Hillary Clinton in the private email server scandal was written 2 months before Hillary was even interviewed by the FBI.
  3. The Uranium One scandal: the FBI had evidence of wrongdoing back in 2009 and an inside informant as well, yet covered it up as it involved Hillary Clinton.
  4. The head of the FBI when Uranium One was being investigated? Robert Mueller, the same is the chief “investigator” of Trump.
  5. Hillary says investigating her would be “an abuse of power”. But investigating President Trump is warranted even when there was no crime to investigate, and said investigation and the FISA warrant were likely obtained using the fictitious Trump dossier.
  6. Peter Strzok texts with mistress Lisa Page. Strzok was a chief investigator on the Clinton email scandal, and was credited with changing the language used in James Comey’s statement on not charging Hillary with a crime. Changing the text amounted to removing the possibility of Clinton being charged with a felony – Hillary was merely “careless” instead of grossly negligent – a felony. Strzok’s texts with Lisa Page spoke of an “insurance policy” against Trump. Peter Strzok was also an investigator for Robert Mueller’s witch-hunt against Trump.
  7. Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, and Hillary Clinton all lied to the FBI. Who cleared these folks? Peter Strzok. Evidence was destroyed and Clinton was given preferential treatment by the FBI. Each of these people – have effectively gotten away with criminal wrongdoing.

On a different front, there is the fictitious disgraceful piece of drivel written by Michael Wolff, Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House. (Rev. Austin Miles wrote a great piece on this book.) This contemptible piece of garbage written by a man with highly questionable writing skills, known for making things up – has the Liberals rubbing their hands together with glee. The Democrats are basically saying regarding this book, see, see – Trump is an idiot; unfit to run this country, mentally unstable. This trash combined with the recently introduced “Stable Genius Act” is the Deep State plan B to remove Trump from office. Plan C is of course the assassination of the president.

In this writer’s opinion, if Trump is such an idiot, a buffoon, is unstable, and has a questionable mental state – how has he accomplished more in a year then the Dems have in 20 years? The stock market is soaring, new jobs are being created at a great pace, companies are coming back to the U.S., and many U.S. companies have recently awarded bonuses to employees and wage hikes, also in some cases announcing expansion plans.

Why then is the Left working overtime to discredit and bring Trump down in flames? Could it be because Trump won’t bow to the Elite and play ball like other presidents? Could it be because Trump has had great success while defying the Elites? Could it be that Trump has the backing of the American people because he is an agent of much needed change?

What claims can the Democrats make on how they have measurably improved the economic status of Americans and the over-all state of the United States? They have no such claims – other than to say, this is how it is, this is the new reality, live with it.

Maybe – the Democrats need to check their Liberal Privilege …

The Clinton crime syndicate has a long history of underhanded deals, illegal activity, fraudulent “fund raising”, and blatant lying among other things. Basically, every form of corruption known, the Clintons and their allies are right in the middle of it.

Apparently, agencies in the U.S. government, like the DOJ, the FBI, and parts of our own intelligence apparatus are ready and willing to cover for Hillary Clinton and others. Congress needs to immediately and thoroughly investigate the DOJ and the FBI at a minimum. This will all turn out to be the biggest scandal and abuse of power in American history.

The Democrats will stop at nothing to bring down President Trump and anyone who aligns themselves with Trump while our mainstream media helps them do it. Not to mention our favorite social media platforms. No one in their right mind should believe a word that is reported by the mainstream media, they are inept fabricators of innuendo and lies.

As for the Demoncrats, it has become painfully obvious – unless you have been hiding under a rock or are an idiot – that the Liberals are neck deep in corruption while denying it and shamelessly attacking President Trump.

America needs to stop drinking the Liberal Kool-Aid served up by Democrats, the Liberal media, Liberal social media, and start rationally thinking for themselves.

 

%d bloggers like this: