Skip to content

Atheist Group Forces Diner to Stop Offering Discount for Praying

August 11, 2014
8/10/2014
Source …..

prayer-discount

Pressured by the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), Mary’s Gourmet Diner in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, has terminated its offer of a 15% discount for customers who would pray publicly as they ate.

Once the FFRF learned of the restaurant’s discount, its attorney Elizabeth Cavell threatened the diner with a complaint in an August 4 letter. Co-owner Mary Haglund immediately capitulated, emailing Cavell on August 6, “I am notifying you & the FFRF that as of today we are no longer offering the 15% discount for Praying in Public.”

The original posting of the restaurant’s offer was revealed in the Greensboro News & Record, which showed a picture of the sign in the window of the diner reading:

We at Mary’s value the support of all our fellow Americans. While you may exercise your right of religious freedom at this restaurant by praying over your meal to any entity or non-entity, we must protect your freedom from religion in a public place. We are no longer issuing the 15% praying in public discount. It is illegal and we are being threatened by lawsuit. We apologize to our community for any offense this discount has incurred.

Cavell’s letter threatened that the diner was flouting the federal Civil Rights Act, asserting, “Mary’s Gourmet Diner may not lawfully offer a discount only to customers who pray… Any promotions must be available to all customers regardless of religious preference or practice on a non-discriminatory basis.”

FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor blustered, “Praise be to Mary! We’re very pleased that Mary’s Gourmet Diner has seen the light about the meaning of the Civil Rights Act, and responded with such alacrity… We have found that most restaurant owners, who, after all, are in business to please all customers, are gracious and drop illegal discounts that selectively reward customer piety.”

On July 17, the IRS agreed to monitor church sermons as a result of a suit brought by FFRF against the IRS. Gaylor said, “This is a victory, and we’re pleased with this development in which the IRS has proved to our satisfaction that it now has in place a protocol to enforce its own anti-electioneering provisions. Of course, we have the complication of a moratorium currently in place on any IRS investigations of any tax-exempt entities, church or otherwise, due to the congressional probe of the IRS. FFRF could refile the suit if anti-electioneering provisions are not enforced in the future against rogue political churches.”

One Comment leave one →
  1. Richard Edgar permalink
    August 11, 2014 10:12 pm

    This is interesting. USC 2000 is understandable in definitions and application for a restaurant. The courts are not clear on the definition of religion. Atheism is a religion by broad definition. The document at the restaurant reflects a discount for “praying in public.”
    What is the definition of the term “pray or praying?” The common dictionary definition is broad. One meaning is to beg or implore. To whom or what entity the beg or implore is directed is not mentioned. Perhaps anyone or any customer could implore or ask for the discount is the meaning of the restaurant documentation? This could be praying in public. In the courts prayer is a term for that part of the pleading in which relief is requested. In review of a cost analysis to determine defending or searching for a legal remedy it not worth fighting unless one has a lot of financial resources. Just ruminating…promotions could be available to all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: