The Bill of Rights has been Revoked!
Justice Sonia Sotomayer – dismantles the Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights has been revoked!
While you were focused on the missing Airliner, there was a little case being heard in front of the Supreme Court called U.S. v. Castleman. The case was a landmark win for the gun control left wing, but what no one realized, is that our Constitution no longer affords us “rights.”
No longer rights that are inviolate
The case was decided March 28, 2014. The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Bill of Rights is no longer made up of “Declaratory and Restrictive Clauses.” They are judicially now perceived as “privileges.” A “privilege” can be revoked for the slightest of legislative causes, but a “Right” is “Forever Inviolate” … We the People no longer have that.
U.S. vs Castleman
The case was about domestic violence, a cause we can all get behind. But, in the end, the Supreme Court has taken away not just domestic violence abuser’s right to bear arms, but all of the people, and in turn has made all of the Bill of Rights void, and made it a Bill of Privileges that can be revoked.
The Preamble states:
“The Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further Declaratory and Restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution.”
While the Constitutional Conventions desired further declaratory and restrictive clauses, the Supreme Court has now taken our rights without anyone noticing and replaced them with privileges. It’s time to wake up America, first this year the NDAA gives Obama the power to arrest anyone without reason and detain them indefinitely. Now we have our Constitution shredded, and still we just move on like nothing has happened.
Harold
ACGR's "News with Attitude" 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This open an opportunity to remove the Supreme Court Judges who made such decision on the ground their decision was political not judicial. I believe the issue of this Court covers left and right. Many from both sides would agree to a revision of how Judges are now appointed based on political reason instead of Constitutional experience.
Let set rigid requirements for a Supreme Court Judge, based on his/her knowledge of the Constitution, not political but scholarly. The very idea that a movement is considering such action will have an effect on the Court. IN general it is time we upgrade the level of our
scholars and our values because right now we are a laughing stock of the world. We need some of the brain who educated our Founders.