The White House Hit List
September 6, 2012
Brasscheck TV
9/6/2012
Strangely, a local Fox News outlet is establishing itself as the best source of reporting on the White House “kill list.”
Since when has Rupert Murdoch ever cared about the rule of law of justice?
Still, we’ll take good reporting where and when we can find it.
A very important and underreported story.
2 Comments
leave one →
Harold
ACGR's "News with Attitude" 
Not sure I want t take this, you really hir my knowledge of past events. Any way: It is a good report presented that way it could have been solved faster.
First: I agree much of it was released not leaked. The only one of recent security was Iran cyber spy new discovery. Well Israel released that in Haaretz not as a secret. It took sole credit for the attack with “Israeli developed that cyber instrument. They wanted right of possession after it got out from Iran of success.
As for hit list, not clear. But it was at the very crucial time as they were trying to determine location of Bin Laden and needed full secrecy.. As for Obama he should stop protecting his State department personnel it is full of spy for Israel because there is the most important place for israel who is so paranoid wants to know every time you go to bathroom. should hit there many are on AIPAC payroll. As for US citizen the Constitution will say it was a war zone our missile hit an armored vehicle, no citizen has any business being in that vehicle.
But is is more simple than that. we have certain rights as citizens but we lose those right and our citizenship the moment we move over the side and fight with the enemy. What is wrong here is the confusion created by a failure to ignore the rule of citizenship for certain people. It is unconstitutional to have dual citizenship because it requires allegiance to foreign government according to any citizenship rule one cannot pledge allegiance to a two governments There are passports of convenience for busines that do not require pleging alleginace. YES OUR CONGRESS IS FULL of people with questionable US citicenship and it is wrong Israel has it for their people and it is questionable can they be drafted by Israel?
We bent too mant rules we need a person that can put that issue on its head again. But Alwaki was no longer citizen . Serving in a foreing army is also uncontituionl but for israel some special provision was made for people who were Jewish but wanted to help Israel at war. Ralph Emmanuel did but he never relinquished his allegiance to the USA. or some in Congress is quetionable like Liebrman who made no excuse he was there in the most crucial posiiton only to vote on what was best for Israel. It may be our
friend but no such thing exist.
in foreign affairs
President Obama’s “Kill List” could erroneously label any American a terrorist suspect—for assassination.
Does President Obama have an “Arrest List of Belligerent Americans” the President or U.S. Government Intends to incarcerate without charges under NDAA? This is where most Americans are vulnerable to Arrest and Indefinite Detention.
Recently the Obama Administration filed an appeal to stop a judge’s injunction that blocked enforcement of some NDAA provisions the Obama Administration stated (were justified) that gives the President the authorization to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Obama can use those blocked provisions of 2013 to round up millions of Americans alleging they are belligerents or threat to National Security. Hitler included similar provisions in his Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933 to arrest German Citizens without evidence by giving power to German Police and other German authorities to arrest without evidence anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama sighed 12-31-11 are similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; confiscate millions of dollars of property.
During the Obama Administration’s recent appeal to stop a Federal Judge blocking enforcement of some provisions in NDAA—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly align with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under NDAA the U.S. Government or President could deem as (directly aligned with militants) e.g. any political or other association; charge any activity, statement, writing or communication with any individual or group government deemed militant is (directly aligned) to arrest and detain Americans. Writers and journalists that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—could under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention. 2012/2013 NDAA and Hitler’s 1933 Decrees are similar; both laws allow forced government censorship; warrant-less searches of private property and property forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in 2013 NDAA keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; and civil asset forfeiture of their property.
You may have noted that NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. Under the Patriot Act, lending itself to Government / police corruption, the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government is only required to use a preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred from knowing or challenging evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.
Sections of 2013 NDAA are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.
Under NDAA It should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.