Skip to content

The Georgia Ballot Challenge

January 27, 2012
Lynn M Stuter

On January 25, 2012, two letters starting making the rounds, concerning three lawsuits filed alleging Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to appear on the Georgia primary ballot.

The three attorneys involved in the three lawsuits are Mark Hatfield, Van Irion and Orly Taitz.  The cases brought by Hatfield and Irion allege that Obama is not eligible as his acknowledged father, Barack Hussein Obama (Sr), was a British subject at the time of Obama’s alleged birth on 4 August 1961, allegedly in Hawaii; that, as such, Obama does not meet the requirements of natural born citizen as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution.  The other case, brought by Taitz, alleges that Obama has presented forged birth certificates, a forged selective service registration, and is using at least one social security number that is not his.  At an early court hearing, Judge Malihi agreed to separate the cases but set the hearing date for all three for January 26, 2012, with Hatfield and Irion presenting their cases, then Taitz presenting her case.

The attorney representing Barack Hussein Obama against these allegations in the Georgia Administrative Court is Michael Jablonski of Atlanta.  On January 25, 2012, the day before the scheduled hearing, Jablonski sent a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp in which he basically excoriated Attorney Taitz, questioned the legality of holding the hearing, requested the SOS suspend the hearing, and further, stated that neither he nor defendant Obama would be present at the proceedings on January 26, 2012.  His letter can be read in full here:

Secretary of State Brian Kemp responded to Jablonski, rejecting his allegations and stating that if Jablonski and his client (defendant Obama) failed to participate in the proceeding on January 26, 2012, he and defendant Obama would do so at their own peril.  That letter can be read in full here:

There have been rumors making the rounds about subpoenas issued … to the State of Hawaii … to Obama to appear on January 26, 2012 at the proceedings.  How true these rumors are is hard to know.  I question the legitimacy of the claim of a subpoena issued by the State of Georgia to the State of Hawaii, allegedly concerning documents held by the State of Hawaii regards Barack Hussein Obama, as a Georgia state court would not have that authority, only a federal court would have that authority.  The State of Georgia could, however, issue a subpoena for Obama to appear as the defendant.

For three years, American citizens have been trying to confirm Obama’s eligibility to the office of president.  For three years, American citizens have been thwarted in that effort by courts who refused to hear cases based on merit, instead ruling that the plaintiffs had no standing.

The fact that Obama …

  1. has acknowledged that his father, Barack Hussein Obama, was a British Subject on 4 August 1961 when he alleges he was born, allegedly in Hawaii;
  2. has produced two birth certificates – one, a short form birth certificate, the other, a long form birth certificate – neither of which has passed the forgery test;
  3. has a selective service registration that, by all appearances, is also a forgery;
  4. has and is using at least three social security numbers that do not appear to be his, issued by states in which he has never lived;
  5. was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and became an Indonesian citizen but has produced no papers showing that he was ever eligible to, or did, reclaim his American birthright;
  6. has provided no proof that he was actually born in Hawaii, at a time when children outside the state of Hawaii and outside the United States could, and did, obtain Hawaiian birth certificates; that the two birth announcements use the address of his maternal grandparents rather than his parents suggests that Obama was born outside Hawaii and outside the United States (the only documents that tend to indicate his birth in Hawaii are his father’s immigrations records);
  7. has sealed all his records that would prove his citizenship and his eligibility – health, education, passport, birth;

has been totally ignored by the courts and by the mainstream press in their zeal to pronounce Obama eligible.  But their zeal does not pass the sniff test for any thinking, reasoning individual.  In the words of the liberals – if Obama has nothing to hide, why is he hiding it?  And why is he hiding it when he proclaimed, right after moving into the Oval Office, that his would be a “transparent administration”?

The lamestream media has, time and again, pointed to the birth documents submitted by Obama as proof.  But not one of the lamestream media personalities, so claiming, have seen, touched or examined the actual documents they proclaim legit; all they have seen, touched or examined are copies which do not constitute anything other than what they are:  copies.  And what they have held up, on air, are copies, not the actual documents nor certified copies of the actual documents.

To this end, the lamestream media tries to ignore the fact that modern computer technology is a boon to forgers, even as they report on forged passports, drivers licenses, social security documents, green cards, etc.  Even the untrained eye picks up on the fact that the curved long form birth certificate, as presented by Obama, has been superimposed over a flat security backdrop.  The document is obviously a forgery.

As with the lamestream media, the same is true of the elected representatives – Democrat and Republican – in Washington, DC.  The pro-Obama camp response to the laundry list of evidence indicating Obama is not eligible to the office he holds is to claim that if the Republicans knew Obama wasn’t eligible, they would do something about it.

Really, considering that the question of eligibility also surrounds John McCain, born in Panama of two American citizens, and Mitt Romney, born in America of a father who was probably a dual Mexican/American citizen and a mother who was American at the time of his birth?  Are the Republicans any less guilty of subverting the United States Constitution, regarding the requirement that the president be natural born, than the Democrats?  I think not.

What is really so apparent, in the letter Jablonski wrote to Secretary of State Kemp, is his (and Obama’s) utter disdain for the American people, for the Constitution and Bill of Rights, for the right of the people to redress of grievances.  Against overwhelming evidence that Obama is not eligible to the office of president, Jablonski tries to use, as Obama’s defense against the lawsuits, the claim that the several courts, before whom cases have been brought regards this matter, have refused to hear the cases; reiterating the excoriating of Taitz by some of those courts.

This, of course, follows the very contention of so many elitists today, that the United States is a democracy, not a constitutional republic.  In a democracy, there is one set of rules for the elite, another for the unwashed masses; the only time elites are held accountable is when they egregiously offend the elitist agenda.  Our Founding Fathers despised democracy, was so abhorrent of it, that James Madison wrote this in Federalist #10:

From this view of the subject, is may be concluded, that a pure Democracy, by which I mean a Society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the Government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction.  A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert results from the form of Government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual.  Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths.  Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of Government, have erroneously supposed, that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.

Our Founding Fathers established, via the Constitution and Bill of Rights, a constitutional republic wherein rule was according to law, where the rights of the minority were protected from the whims of the majority, where justice was to be blind to race, color, creed, gender, power and position.

This, however, is not the situation we have today, where justice is meted out according to who you are, who you know, how much power you have, your position.  As such, those with money and power are not prosecuted, while prisons overflow with the “unwashed masses” alleged to have committed crimes against society.  Thus it is that we have a government so totally out of control that it holds no resemblance to the government established by our Founding Fathers.  Thus it is that Barack Hussein Obama, John McCain and Mitt Romney believe they can thumb their noses at the eligibility requirement of the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 5:

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

By virtue of his father being a British subject on 4 August 1961, Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the requirement of being natural born.  By virtue of being born in Panama of American citizens, John McCain did not meet the requirement of being natural born.  By virtue of his father, George Romney, possibly being a dual Mexican/American citizen at his birth, Mitt Romney has not proven he is natural born.

I have heard from Republicans who contend I’m a closet Democrat for demanding that Mitt Romney prove his eligibility.  Whether Democrat or Republican, it makes no difference; the United States Constitution says that all candidates must be natural born!

If the American people allow this situation to continue, they do so at their own peril.

© 2012 Lynn M Stuter – All Rights Reserved.
6 Comments leave one →
  1. January 28, 2012 11:21 am

    The federal government in particular has become a freewheeling, unencumbered what’s-in-for-me leviathan, a keep-the-riffraff-out fraternity and sorority of me-first, what-Constitution? elites. I have ZERO respect for and faith in 90% of them. And because I fear the damage they have done and will continue to do to this once great Republic, we are not free.

    To paraphrase Mr. Jefferson: If the government fears the people, there is liberty; if the people fear the government, there is tyranny.

    We are in one helluva bind. If the GA Sec of State disallows Obama’s name on the ballot, other SOSs will surely follow, and the logjam of lawsuits against Obama will break open. Talk about major Constitutional Crisis!! Wow!! THE burning question for me: to what extent will Obama and his thuggish elites go to retain power and avoid criminal charges? And this question: is Hillary, another Alinskyite, on her way into the White House?

    Talk about scary. If Obama is rendered constitutionally ineligible, his Administration is retroactively null and void; all laws, exec orders will be void. What a mess, huh?

  2. Rikki permalink
    January 28, 2012 10:23 am


    That is an excellent point. I had actually considered this after I had posted my comment. Obviously, many Republicans do not care about this issue or else it would have been brought to the forefront prior to Obama’s nomination. No Republican in DC bothered to stand up for our Constitution in regards to the ‘natural born’ clause. This is not a left vs right problem, this is an American problem. Thank you for pointing that out.

  3. January 27, 2012 10:13 pm

    Want to thank all of you, for your Powerfull stand against Oboma & His Corrupted political partners.

    But there is so much more we Can do. Being aggressive and focusing on the facts and truth is only the first step.

    We musT follow Up with more details standing by our convictions and dont back down.

    Oboma has NOT brought CHANGE, In fact ~! ~ THE ONLY real THING needing CHANGE !….Was Barack Hussein Obama II.


    Barack Hussein Obama II ( Who hates American Values ) who is A ” SELF PROCLAIMED Enemy” ~of responsible, Morally Conscious HARD WORKING Americans.

    oBOMAS Irresponsible & DRUG MAFIA and reckless supporters KNOW~ that Barack Hussein Obama II, WILL FORCE YOU to paY THEM, out of your PockeT .{ FOR all of their UNCHECKED Vices and THRILLS/

    { All on YOU | /

    At your COST & Sacrifice

    …This UN~CHANGABLE fraud, has done His VERY BEST to Inspire VIOLENCE. For THESE ARE OBAMAS Very OWN WORDS.. saying ………To his supporters.

    Saying “Get ready for hand-to-hand combat with your Fellow Americans”

    – Obama has ALSO DECLARED to his Supporters….“I want all Americans to get in each others Faces!– Obama demands !

    “You bring a knife to a fight pal, we’ll bring a gun” –

    THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. /and ANGER VIOLENCE and more taxes….. THIS IS OBAMAS Change for america “Hit Back Twice As Hard”. He commands !*Obama on the private sector: ~~ “We talk to these folks…~ / so I know whose a*$ to KICK.“ OBOMA wants to KICK your a*$ / Shouting THAT Republican

    victory would mean ~ “hand to hand combat”

    HE IS EXPECTING people to be on Edge and BORDERLINE killing MODE, VIOLENT / and STAND up for their immoral CAUSES


    * Obama Tells democrats: “ I’m itching for a fight.” !

    ….PLEASE…. go to reXes NEW WebsiTe ~ ! Oboma *( Just like Adolf Hitler~~\oBOMA~~~ Demands ! — [ THE FINAL SOLUTION – for Un~Wanted Children

    Barak Obama is A MURDERER .~Torturing UNWANTED babys on DEATH ROE


    OBAMA TAKES a little NEW BORN innocent child. BORN. ALIVE STabS it iN the Head SUCKs ITS BRAINS OUT.

    This is just too wrong and horrible. Please stand for Loving Children and the USA

  4. January 27, 2012 2:07 pm

    Couldn’t agree more. One thing though: Republicans didn’t make a “fuss” over Obama’s ineligibility. Patriots, some of whom have been derisively described as “birthers”, led the charge. Precious few Republicans saw it as an issue at all. Tragically, elites are elites, no matter their political stripe.

  5. Rikki permalink
    January 27, 2012 10:30 am


    We must keep ALL ineligible candidates off of the ballots no matter what party they represent. Repblicans cannot afford to overlook this after all of the fuss they have made over Obama’s ineligibility. Not only would it be the height of hypocrisy, it would undermine all of the hard work that those whom have been fighting this issue in court, have put into it. Not to mention that it would render our “natural born citizen” clause in the Constitution moot.

    Thank goodness that my candidate of choice does not have this issue hanging around his neck however, if he did, I would have to find a new candidate to support, even though I greatly admire the man. The Constitution matters!

  6. January 27, 2012 9:50 am

    Well said.

    And now Romney AND Gingrich are touting Sen. Rubio as their VP choice. Hands down, this stellar gentleman is, unfortunately, NOT a natural born citizen. On their part, it’s either benign neglect, willful ignorance or a depraved disgregard for the Constitution. We must keep this issue front and center and let ’em childishly hurl epithets at us patriots and constitutionalists all day. We can take it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: