Why Did We Kill Anwar Al-Awlaki and Not Jane Fonda?
If Barack Obama ordered Anwar al-Awlaki killed for spreading enemy propaganda, I demand he do the same for Jane Fonda.
Obama placed al-Awlaki on a kill list, then checked him off that list, because he spread fundamentalist Islamic propaganda and apparently encouraged several terrorists or would-be jihadists, including Ft. Hood shooter Nidal Hassan and “Underwear Bomber” Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (who claims al-Awlaki is still alive). Jane Fonda made multiple radio broadcasts reading Communist agitprop written by her North Vietnamese hosts, whom she energized both in person and through photographs. Al-Awlaki spread his poison from Yemen, a nation with which the United States is not (formally) at war; Jane Fonda traveled to North Vietnam at a time when no doubt existed about our state of hostilities or the location of the battlefield. Al-Awlaki proved effective because he knew American popular culture; Jane Fonda was popular culture.
If Obama killed Anwar al-Awlaki, shouldn’t he be consistent and order the shooting of Jane Fonda, as well?
Harold
ACGR's "News with Attitude" 
Jane Fonda did not do any of the seven reasons that will cause loss of citizenship. Also she did not participate and order the kiling of Americans. Jane Fonda could have been accused of fraternizing with the enemy. That could fall under espionage law if such evidence were found.
Since there are no existing laws covering what she did she did not break any law. Perhaps we should have those laws but we don’t even enforce the 7 laws considered cause of loss of citizensh because of we did special interest many Congressional Representative would be introuble. We are badly in need of a revision of enforcement of loyalty
laws for our official, apecify what is not acceptable and enforce existing one.
oath laws