Skip to content

A Conspiracy to Change the “natural born Citizen” Requirement

June 10, 2011
Neil Turner


If you think that our Congress-members do not know about nor understand the meaning of the ‘natural born Citizen’ requirements for one to be President and Commander in Chief, then you must take a look at the efforts they have made to eliminate it over the past decade.

And if you are wondering why Rep. Darrell Issa, as head of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, refuses to address the greatest Constitutional crisis ever in the history of our Constitutional Republic, just see below where the illustrious Congressman was a co-sponsor on H.J.R 59 [6] in the 108th Congress in 2003 – to totally eliminate the natural born Citizen requirement:

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit persons who are not natural-born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of President and Vice President.

And they were obviously aware that this blatant conspiracy to deprive Americans of the original intent to provide this nation with an allegiance-only-to-America President and Commander in Chief would be a major change to one of the original Articles, not even a mistaken Amendment (like prohibition):

That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States after the date of its submission for ratification.

As the facts will show, this is not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’, this is a full-blown and massive ‘Conspiracy’ – to alter our form of government by dissembling and deceit. That, my Constitution-loving friends … is TREASON.

And now… the rest of the story. …..

One Comment leave one →
  1. June 11, 2011 1:28 am

    Actually, while it has nothing to do with the rule to be president, it is the present interpretation of Natural Born that is out of sink with the Founders if we accept that the Founders based their decision on value derived from their British Crown fight for their right as citizens.

    Given what has been done with that mistake or deliberate political maneuver, it is time the Court if not Congress takes up this matter once again because we are swamped with what was called airport drop in birth and all those aliens. According to the traditions and laws of the time to be a natural citizen one had to be the child of a citizen. My statement is based on documents on record not to prove or disapprove Obama position.
    The original rule would require immigrant to become citizens before giving birth to a citizen otherwise the child would have to become a citizenship like all foreign born. To refuse to consider this because it leaves Obama out of the
    argument is like cutting your nose to spite your face.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: