Skip to content

Ventura’s Groundbreaking Interview on 9/11 and the Threat to Our Liberties

December 19, 2010
Aaron Dykes

Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory will continue to dole out groundbreaking information tonight on TruTV at 10 PM EST / 9 PM CST with the “9/11 Pentagon” Episode, yet another in a line of subjects that have, until this point, been too controversial to cover at all on television. Tonight’s episode features the unknowns about the dozens of suppressed video angles, the lack of physical or photographic evidence that a plane hit the building and the impossibility of an unskilled pilot circling around his target or hitting at ground-level without even scorching the earth beneath him.

From TruTV:

Pentagon – NEW!
Airs: Fri, December 17 at 10P
The idea that a missile or explosives—not a hijacked jetliner—damaged the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 seems the most unlikely of 9/11 theories. That is, until you look at all the factors, which include eyewitness testimony, crime scene video, expert analysis and the question why, with 85 cameras trained on the building, have only five frames of crash footage have ever been released? Jesse Ventura leads a serious investigation into a tangled web of clues that some say are too sacred to even touch.

And now… the rest of the story. …..

One Comment leave one →
  1. Ross Wolf permalink
    December 19, 2010 2:29 pm

    If a hijacked jet passenger plane didn’t hit the Pentagon where is the plane? The passengers? The huge amount of passenger luggage that would have been scattered at the Pentagon? Jesse Ventura’s show said the plane strangely disappeared from radar 28-minutes before the Pentagon was struck. If the Pentagon wasn’t hit by the hijacked plane wouldn’t radar have later pick up the plane flying. Was that radar blocked?

    Jesse Ventura mentions the pilot during training had difficulty flying a Censa, that it was almost impossible this pilot could have maneuvered the turn necessary to hit the Pentagon. That reminds me of Timothy McVeigh who was alleged to have brought down the Oklahoma City Alfred P. Murrah Building on April 19, 1995 leaving a bomb loaded van in front of the building: several early news following the bombing reported McVeigh, shortly before the bombing, had difficulty setting off small explosives on a ranch property. But miraculously the van McVeigh left in front of the Oklahoma building apparently had several 50 gallon drums of fertilizer explosives linked together, perfectly synchronized to explode. Just months prior to the (Oklahoma Bombing), the “1995, Anti-Terrorist and Death Penalty Act was introduced.” The 1995 act included many provisions from the failed to pass 1993 “Crime Control Act” introduced before the first Trade Center bombing. After the Oklahoma federal building was bombed, Congress had almost no public resistance passing the “1996 Anti-Terrorist and Death Penalty Act that included provisions from the failed “1993 Crime Control Act.” For example: under the 1996 Anti-Terrorist and Death Penalty Act, prosecutors could use Secret Hearings, secret paid informants, secret testimony, secret witnesses and other hidden evidence to convict U.S. Citizens for terrorist acts. Defense against government terrorist charges, even against the Death Penalty became difficult if not possible; the passed legislation was particularly alarmingly because U.S. Police/Government routinely pay and make deals with informants to provide court testimony. Most Provisions that failed to be included in the 1996 Anti-Terrorist and Death Penalty Act were subsequently passed in the 2001 Patriot Act—that included Congress giving Government the power to (retroactively go back several years to arrest U.S. Citizens and seize their property based on a mere Preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay.

    Question: In 1993 after terrorists set off the bomb at the Trade Center an FBI informant’s tapes were published by the New York and LA Times that showed the informant told the FBI the terrorists were going to set off the bomb. Six people were killed. (Importantly) did love ones of those killed sue the FBI or was there an out of court government settlement; lawsuits would have been problematic after the informant’s tapes showed (FBI involvement in the bombing.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: