Evangelical Leaders Sass ADL
For nearly a century, the existence of ADL (Anti-Defamation League) has been unmentionable in public statements by Christian/conservative leaders. The ACLU may be freely vilified and also, of late, the Southern Poverty Law Center. But ADL, the ultimate predator upon Christian values and American freedoms, has a reputation for zero tolerance of criticism from those in high leadership. Like a killer whale erupting through an ice flow, propelling the scattering seals into terrified flight, ADL, if provoked, can explode in rage, roaring, “Anti-Semite!” The threat of such repercussion sends waves of terror through religious and political leaders.
Although our leaders are acutely aware of ADL, they do their best to placate the monster, granting its desire for exemption from scrutiny. That’s why they have never told you of such enormous danger.
THE EARLIEST “HATE” CRIMINALS
If you can’t guess the people I have in mind, I’ll give you
some clues—clues found in a major world religion that is many
centuries old. I’ll call it Religion X.
Religion X traces its roots back to the First Couple, Adam and
Eve. They were on earth before any other form of worship—before
Islam (appearing 14 centuries ago), before Hinduism or Buddhism
(appearing 25 centuries ago), before even the worship of various
gods in Mesopotamia (60 centuries ago).
Early on, Religion X’ers were told by their God: “Love your
neighbor—and even the stranger who dwells among you—as much as
you love yourself.” But it wasn’t long before Religion X began
rebelling against the laws of the One who had blessed and
preserved it so much. In response God warned: “All those who hate
me love death.”
After centuries of hating their God (which predictably led to
hatred of fellow humans, God’s creations), Religion X’ers were
allowed by God to be conquered and transported to ancient Babylon
where they experienced a 1,600-year-long “vacation.”
If you haven’t guessed yet, the religion I’m describing is
Judaism. But don’t stop reading. The
most shocking stuff is just ahead!
While in Babylon, the “wise men” among the people began
formulating new laws which supposedly supplemented and explained
the time-tested Old Testament writings. But the new rules actually
contradicted and eventually replaced the original laws!
The “new and improved” laws are collectively known as the
Talmud. Even though rabbis are Talmudic experts, probably not one
Jew in a thousand (and not one non-Jew in ten thousand) knows what
is in the Talmud. Without further delay, here’s some of the
Talmud’s “wisdom” (plus sources):
(I) THE TALMUD HATES SCIENCE:
Hyenas turn into bats after seven years, and later on turn into
thorns and demons (Baba Kamma, 16a).
Being naked in front of a lamp causes epilepsy (Pesahim, 112b).
There’s medicinal value in dirt found in an outhouse’s shadow,
also in a white dog’s excrement (Gittin, 69a,b).
(II) THE TALMUD HATES FEMALES:
The birth of a girl is an unhappy event (Baba Bathra, 16b).
It is never good to talk too much to women including one’s own
wife (Aboth, 1.5).
All women are “temperamentally light-headed” (Kiddushin, 80b).
It is okay to divorce your wife if she spoils your food, or if
you find a more beautiful woman (Gittin, 91a).
(III) THE TALMUD HATES CHILDREN:
It is lawful for a girl three years old to have sexual
intercourse (Abodah Zarah, 37a; Kethuboth, 11b,39a; Sanhedrin,
55b,69a,b; Yebamoth, 12a,57b,58a,60b).
When a man commits sodomy with a boy under nine years of age,
it “is not deemed as pederasty” (Sanhedrin, 54b,55a).
Sexual intercourse with a boy under the age of eight is lawful
since it isn’t fornication (Sanhedrin, 69b).
(In other words, Religion X became X-rated! Is it any wonder
that many Jewish persons today are liberally involved with the
current sexual revolution and are even favorable towards
legalization of adult-child sex?)
(IV) THE TALMUD HATES ALL NON-JEWS:
Since all Gentiles are only animals, all Gentile children are
bastards (Yebamoth, 98a).
When a non-Jew robs a Jew, he has to pay him back, but if a Jew
robs a non-Jew, he doesn’t have to pay him back. Moreover, when a
Gentile kills a Jew, the Gentile must be killed, but when a Jew
kills a Gentile, “there is no death penalty” (Sanhedrin, 57a).
It is okay to “use subterfuges” in a court of law in order to
cheat a non-Jew (Baba Kamma, 113a).
(V) THE TALMUD HATES CHRIST AND CHRISTIANS:
Jesus was born a bastard (Jewish Encyclopedia, “Jesus”;
Yebamoth, 49b).
Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a whore and “played the harlot
with carpenters” (Sanhedrin, 106a,b).
Jesus “practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy”
(Sanhedrin, 43a).
Jesus was punished and sent to Hell where he ended up in
“boiling hot excrement” (Gittin, 56b,57a).
Christians will go to Hell “and be punished there for all
generations” (Rosh Hashanah, 17a).
Those who read “the works of the Judeo-Christians, i.e., the
New Testament” will end up in Hell (Sanhedrin, 90a).
The books of the Christians “may not be saved from a fire, but
they must be burnt in their place, they and the Divine Names
occurring in them” (Shabbath, 116a).
(Now you know what’s been inspiring many of the anti-Christian
attitudes and actions these days.)
By roughly 500 A.D. Jewish scribes had completed the voluminous
Talmud, the written version of what had long been the Jews’ oral
tradition—the tradition that Jesus condemns in the 23rd chapter
of Matthew and other parts of the New Testament.
Whenever anyone claims that for 1500 years the Talmud
needlessly aggravated Gentiles (who in turn put Jews into ghettos
and even the Holocaust), Jews can look at even earlier history and
claim that the “anti-Jewishness” of the New Testament forced Jews
to hit back with their printed version of the Talmud.
Actually the New Testament, like a newspaper, merely reflects
the true condition of Judaism at that time. If someone could prove
that damaging descriptions of Jews never appeared before the New
Testament, that would be one thing. But during many centuries
prior to Jesus or any Christians, Jews were saying and doing the
same things that we find them still saying and doing during New
Testament days!
If the New Testament record of their words and works is
“anti-Semitic,” is the Old Testament record of the same
rebelliousness just as “anti-Semitic”?
A while ago I was talking with a young woman in Los Angeles who
is training to become a rabbi. I asked her about the Talmud. (She
seemed shocked I should know so much about it already!) “Oh,” she
said, “I don’t think it’s as relevant as it once was.” When I told
her that the “hate” movie “The Last Temptation of Christ” was an
amazingly accurate reflection of the Talmud—and that more such
“hate” films are in the works because Hollywood takes the Talmud
seriously—she had no explanation.
In the future when “hate” laws are passed, will the incredibly
hate-filled Talmud and some hate-promoting film studios be swept
under the rug?
[You are allowed to publish this non-copyrighted article. To avoid the prevalent internet censorship, feel free to change the title to “The Original ‘Hate’ Criminals” (or Crooks, etc.) or “The Earliest ‘Hate’ Rebels” (or People, Persons, etc.) or “The History of Hate” (or the Jews, the Hebrews, Judaism, etc.) or any other meaningful title, or no title.]
[Also Google “David Letterman’s Hate, Etc.”]
The ADL is nothing but a terrorist front group engaged in attacking those who attempt to curb Jewish extremism and Israeli State Terror waged by Jews against innocent civilians in the name of Global Jewish Security.
Propaganda machines are used to indoctrinate and instill fear in those who might dare to speak out as critics of Israel. The result is an ignorant, ill-informed public whose judgement is then clouded by lack of access to truth in news coverage.
Ignorant people can then be turned into mobs thus manipulated to do the bidding of the elite ADL Jews who seek to further the Jewish supremest cause.