Skip to content

Nancy Pelosi’s email to blue-state governors

June 16, 2020

Bill McCusker


Source …..

Dear blue-state governors:

On last night’s call I detected some concern about the amount of federal money coming to you to fund your state budgets in exchange for exploiting the virus and racial/police riots in pursuit of our goal of getting rid of Trump.

I will address the money issue, but first let’s step back and reexamine all the good work we have done to date.

Since March, we have had nightly calls that coordinate our attacks on Trump using the virus and now the racial unrest as our primary weapons.

We have coordinated closely with our media allies, the DNC, the Squad, Antifa, BLM, SPLC, the NBA, the NFL, Women’s Soccer, Soros, FBI, CIA, NSA and other groups that hate Trump.

All this builds on the anti-Trump measures we have already coordinated to fan anti-Trump hatred: the Kavanaugh hearings, Russia, Ukraine, impeachment, Stone, Manafort and so on. Not to mention all the Green New Deal, LGBTQ and “white supremacy” curricula we have loaded into public schools!

You all have performed brilliantly in our concerted plan to use the virus to hurt Trump.

You have shut down your economies, doing great and lasting harm to Trump’s national economy.

You have closed churches and kept them closed.

We are at over 40,000,000 unemployed! Let’s keep going! 50,000,000 by July 4!

BUT, you have ensured all state and public union workers have gotten 100% of their paychecks whether they are working or not. Remember where their political donations go!

You have agreed to keep your economies closed far longer than medically needed.

You have put sick people into nursing homes so that we can rack up more casualties and scare more people into compliance.

You have avoided using Trump’s hospital ships and tents.

You have arrested those small-business owners trying to reopen.

You have agreed to coordinate our reporting of another wave of COVID in late October.

AND – this is the best yet – you have scared people enough to let us shut polling places in November, force the use of mail-in ballots and thus let us work our voting “mail-in magic”! Remember: This is all about votes!

Now with the racial situation, you have:

  • Fanned the flames of racial unrest and manufactured an outstanding level of sustained rage, just as we planned. You make Obama and Holder in Ferguson look like amateurs!
  • Followed perfectly the script we developed on “All Whites Are Racists and All Blacks are Victims.” Notice how all the CEOs are on board!
  • Marched publicly for the media to see. Social distancing … ha!
  • Let your cities be taken over.
  • Told the cops to stand down.
  • Fired police without investigations.
  • Called for Defunding the Police.
  • Let looting proceed without consequences.
  • Released the rioters and looters without prosecution.
  • Ignored black-on-bBlack crime.
  • Ignored actual crime statistics and the real story on the War on Cops. (I hate that Heather Mac Donald!)

You have done so much! Take a bow! We have really hurt Trump! He’s gonzo in November, and I will still be House speaker!

Now, some of you are concerned that you may have gone overboard, that your people are hurting and (worse) that your reelection chances might have been harmed. You say that you need more money from the feds. What about all that stimulus money I already gave you? Trillions! So how about a little gratitude! Yes, Trump blocked the latest $3.5 trillion I said I would get for you, but please, did you really think I was serious about the 3.5?!

So, yes, I’ll get you more money – the dumb Republicans like to spend, too! But please, man up for heaven’s sake. We are almost there! Don’t get weak on me now!

Looking forward to our call tonight. Same time.


‘Shocking’ list of what’s killed the most people in 2020

April 2, 2020

Joe Kovacs


Source …..

U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Mario Lopez-Casas, a heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration specialist with the 146th Civil Engineer Squadron in the California Air National Guard’s 146th Airlift Wing, puts sheets on a hospital bed while setting up a Federal Medical Station, March 29, 2020, inside the Los Angeles Convention Center as part of California’s statewide COVID-19 response effort. This is the third medical station site the Airmen have set up in the state. (U.S. Air National Guard video by Staff Sgt. Crystal Housman)

With millions of Americans concerned about coronavirus, radio host Rush Limbaugh is providing some perspective on the actual number of fatalities from COVID-19 compared to those from other causes.

On his Wednesday broadcast, Limbaugh cited a list from that rounded up the worldwide deaths from Jan. 1 through March 25 of 2020:

  • “Coronavirus: 21,000 deaths.
  • Seasonal flu: 113,000.
  • Malaria: 228,000.
  • Suicide: 249,000.
  • Traffic fatalities, 313, almost 314,000 deaths.
  • HIV/AIDS, 391,000 deaths.
  • Alcohol related deaths, 581,000.
  • Smoking-related deaths, 1,162,000.
  • Cancer deaths, 1,909,000 deaths.
  • Deaths attributed to starvation, 2,382,000 deaths.
  • And death by abortion, 9,900,000.”

“I’m not trying to make any correlation,” Limbaugh explained.

“I’m not trying to say, ‘Hey, we’re overreacting to coronavirus death.’ I’m just giving you the stats here. You can react to these stats however you wish.”

He added: “You still have some really shocking numbers. Because we don’t talk about it. We got suicide hotlines. We try to teach people to drive safely. We do whatever we do with HIV/AIDS. We tell people to drink responsibly, tell people not to smoke, try to devise cancer treatments, we try to feed people.”

Limbaugh even mentioned efforts by his hometown of Palm Beach, Florida: “The town website where I live is chiding people for being on the beach, for standing too close together while their dogs are pooping. I mean, you wouldn’t believe it. I’ve seen it all.”


Iranian Militia Leader Leading Iraq U.S. Embassy Raid Listed as Obama White House Guest

December 31, 2019

Lucas Nolan


Source …..

Iranian militia leader Hadi al-Amiri, one of several identified as leading an attack on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad on Tuesday, reportedly visited the White House in 2011 during the presidency of Barack Obama.

On Tuesday, a mob in Baghdad attacked the U.S. embassy in retaliation against last weekend’s U.S. airstrikes against the Iran-backed Shiite militia Kataib Hezbollah (KH), responsible for killing an American civilian contractor. KH is one of a number of pro-Iran militias that make up the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF/PMU), which legally became a wing of the Iraqi military after fighting the Sunni Islamic State terrorist group.

President Donald Trump has since accused Iran of having “orchestrated” the embassy attack and stated that the government would be “held fully responsible.”

Breitbart News reporter John Hayward described the attack on the embassy, writing:

The mob grew into thousands of people, led by openly identified KH supporters, some of them wearing uniforms and waving militia flags. The attack began after a funeral service for the 25 KH fighters killed by the U.S. airstrikes. Demonstrators marched through the streets of Baghdad carrying photos of the slain KH members and Iraq’s top Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, who condemned the American airstrikes.

KH vowed to seek revenge for the airstrikes on Monday. Both KH and the Iranian military unit that supports it, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), have been designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S. government. The government of Saudi Arabia also described KH as one of several “terrorist militias supported by the Iranian establishment” in remarks on Tuesday condemning the assault on the U.S. embassy.

The attackers were able to smash open a gate and push into the embassy compound, lighting fires, smashing cameras, and painting messages such as “Closed in the name of resistance” on the walls. Gunshots were reportedly heard near the embassy, while tear gas and stun grenades were deployed by its defenders.

A uniformed militia fighter on the scene in Baghdad told Kurdish news service Rudaw that attacks were also planned against the U.S. consulates in Erbil and Basra, with the goal of destroying the consulates and killing everyone inside.

The Washington Post reported Tuesday that among those agitating protesters in Baghdad on Tuesday was Hadi al-Amiri, a former transportation minister with close ties to Iran who leads the Badr Corps, another PMF militia.

In 2011, both Fox News and the Washington Times noted that then-Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki brought his transportation minister, al-Amiri, to a meeting at the White House. The Times noted that the White House did not confirm his attendance, but the official was on Iraq’s listed members of its delegation.

The al-Amiri accompanying al-Maliki, besides also being transportation minister, was identified at the time as a commander of the Badr organization, further indicating it was the same person. At the time, the outlets expressed concern that al-Amiri had ties to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which the FBI has stated played a role in a 1996 terrorist attack that killed 19 U.S. servicemen. President Donald Trump designated the IRGC a foreign terrorist organization, the first time an official arm of a foreign state received the designation.

Fox News’ Ed Henry questioned White House Press Secretary Jay Carney following the visit about the attendance of al-Amiri at the White House. Carney refused to answer and stating that he would need to investigate the issue. The full transcript from RealClearPolitics reads:

Ed Henry, FOX News: When Prime Minister Maliki was here this week there have been reports that a former commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, which U.S. officials say played a role in a 1996 terrorist attack that killed 19 U.S. servicemen.

He was here at the White House with Prime Minister Maliki because he’s a transportation minister, yeah, transportation minister —

Jay Carney, WH: Who’s [sic] report is that?

Henry: I believe the Washington Times has reported it. I think others have as well, but I think this is a Washington Times —

Carney: I have to take that question then, I’m not aware of it.

Henry: Can you just answer it later though, whether he was here and whether a background check had been done?

Carney: I’ll check on it for you.

Henry: Okay, thanks.

In 2016, Obama secured a deal with Iran which included a payment of $1.7 billion in cash. Breitbart News reporter John Hayward reported in September of 2016:

On Tuesday, the Obama administration finally admitted something its critics had long suspected: The entire $1.7 billion tribute paid to Iran was tendered in cash — not just the initial $400 million infamously shipped to the Iranians in a cargo plane — at the same moment four American hostages were released.

“Treasury Department spokeswoman Dawn Selak said in a statement the cash payments were necessary because of the ‘effectiveness of U.S. and international sanctions,’ which isolated Iran from the international finance system,” said ABC News, relating what might be one of history’s strangest humblebrags. The sanctions Obama threw away were working so well that he had to satisfy Iran’s demands with cold, hard cash!

By the way, those sanctions were not entirely related to Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. As former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy pointed out at National Review last month, they date back to Iran’s seizure of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, its support for “Hezbollah’s killing sprees,” and, most pertinently, Bill Clinton’s 1995 invocation of “federal laws that deal with national emergencies caused by foreign aggression,” by which he meant Iran’s support for international terrorism.

Former white house staffer during the Obama administration, Ben Rhodes, blamed President Trump’s policies for the Tuesday attack on the U.S. embassy.

Many have hit back at Rhodes for the accusations, including former CIA ops officer Bryan Dean Wright.

No further information has been given about al-Amiri’s presence at the U.S. embassy raid on Tuesday. Read more about the attack on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad at Breitbart News here.


Can We Even Be Fair Anymore?

December 7, 2019

Charlie Daniels


Source …..

I have been on this earth for 83 years and I remember elections and political climates from the days of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt administration through the present day.

Roosevelt was given credit for ending the Great Depression by the people in my part of the country and was very popular and could depend on plenty of votes to carry the “Solid South.”

He was much loved, but his wife Eleanor was maligned and disrespected for reasons I don’t even remember, probably because she was the epitome of what we imagined to be the haughty elite who thought themselves better than those of us much farther down the food chain.

Actually, Eleanor Roosevelt was a kind-hearted woman who did a lot of good in her life, but her finishing school speech and the inability to affect any “down to earthness” was enough to brand her as aloof and cold to edgy Southerners who were the object of so much criticism, hyperbole and jokes in those days, considered slow, dumb and incestuous by so many uninformed “Yankees.”

Actually, we knew very little about Mrs. Roosevelt, our concept was prejudiced, ill-conceived and stemmed from nothing more than swift glimpses of her in newspapers and the newsreels that showed in between the cartoons and the ever-present black and white westerns that played in every theater in the Southeast religiously every Saturday.

When Roosevelt died, and Harry S. Truman came to power, he was perceived as being weak and feckless and not able to hold his own with Stalin, who was trying to gobble the entire European Continent.

His critics were proven wrong many times over as Truman demonstrated his mettle time after time in the tumultuous period that followed the Second World War, and why anybody would consider the man who had to live with being responsible for dropping the first and only atomic bombs as being weak is ridiculous in hindsight.

Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, H.W. Bush, Clinton, W. Bush and Obama had their detractors and apologists, but no president in my lifetime has been the object of as much concerted scorn and downright hate as Donald Trump.

Congressional committees, TV personalities, columnists, bloggers, Hollywood heavyweights, foreign leaders and pundits and talking heads of all strata and stripe seem to have boiled their reason for living down to one thing, remove Trump from office.

And as we all now know, the articles of impeachment will go forward in the House and if passed there, which I have no doubt it will be, will go to trial in the Senate.

With a booming economy, record unemployment, stratospheric stock market, rebuilt military, economy crippling restrictions removed, independence from foreign oil, and too many positive improvements to list here, it’s strange why – especially with an election in eleven months – this incredible and determined army of malcontents would be arrayed against a president that was elected by the people.

Now let’s kick the gearshift into neutral for a few minutes and try to assess the situation, putting aside personal likes and dislikes, Democrats or Republican, left, right, middle of the road, whatever.

Let’s just take a look at what has surfaced so far, and I know that the hearings, especially the Nadler sessions with the Ivy League law professors were long, laborious, extremely hard to understand, but if you’ve gleaned anything from them use your own common sense in answering these questions, because the majority opinion of what I’m about to ask could well define our Republic for the next several decades.

  1. So far in the Congressional hearings have you seen or heard anything that is, in your own mind, an impeachable offense?
  2. Has President Trump done anything that has endangered our security?
  3. Should the president serve at the pleasure of the American electorate or the whim of the majority of the House of Representatives?
  4. If this goes forth and impeachment is carried out will there ever be another president with opposing majorities in the Congress who will not be in danger of impeachment?

Adam Schiff and the Democrats have opened a Pandora’s Box that could well keep this Republic embroiled in political civil war for the foreseeable future.

In essence, Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi and their Democrat majority are trying to strip We the People of our constitutional rights, to elect a president, with mere months to go until an election.

If this sordid cancer metastasizes to its full potential, Heaven help us all.

What do you think?

Pray for our troops our police and the peace of Jerusalem.

God Bless America

Charlie Daniels


Joy Behar: ‘It’s outrageous and stupid to call a black person a racist’

July 30, 2019


Source …..

isnt-if-hitler-a-then-nin-le-well-heres-your-sign“The View” co-host Joy Behar declared Monday that it’s “outrageous and stupid” to call a black person racist as President Trump did over the weekend with Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings.

“Elijah is the black man,” Ms. Behar said on the show, according to a clip published by the Washington Examiner. “He’s calling the black man the racist. I mean, I don’t think people understand that particularly. It’s outrageous and stupid to call a black person a racist.”

Ms. Behar’s comments were referring to Mr. Trump’s weekend tweetstorm attacking “racist” Mr. Cummings and the city of Baltimore after the congressman blasted the conditions of U.S. migrant detention facilities. Mr. Trump claimed that Mr. Cummings’ 7th District is “a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess” that’s “FAR WORSE and more dangerous” than the border.

“If racist Elijah Cummings would focus more of his energy on helping the good people of his district, and Baltimore itself, perhaps progress could be made in fixing the mess that he has helped to create over many years of incompetent leadership,” the president wrote.

Mr. Cummings responded to Mr. Trump’s attacks by defending his record in Baltimore and asking the president to support legislation to let the government negotiate directly for lower drug prices.


Donald Trump: Elijah Cummings Is a ‘Brutal Bully’ to Border Patrol

July 27, 2019

Charlie Spiering


Source …..

baltimore-riot-police-carPresident Donald Trump criticized Rep. Elijah Cummings on Saturday, calling him a “brutal bully” to border patrol officials and suggesting he should help fix the city of Baltimore.

“Rep, Elijah Cummings has been a brutal bully, shouting and screaming at the great men & women of Border Patrol about conditions at the Southern Border, when actually his Baltimore district is FAR WORSE and more dangerous,” Trump wrote on Twitter.

Trump challenged Cummings after the veteran lawmaker exploded at Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin K. McAleenan for the treatment of detained migrant children crossing the border.

McAleenan said the Department of Homeland Security was “doing [its] level best” to take care of the children.

“What does that mean?” Cummings roared. “What does that mean when a child is sitting in their own feces, can’t take a shower? Come on, man. What’s that about? None of us would have our children in that position. They are human beings”:

Trump defended the border facilities as “clean, efficient, and well run,” albeit “very crowded,” while Cummings’ district was considered the “worst in the USA.”

“Cumming District is a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess,” he wrote. “If he spent more time in Baltimore, maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place.”

Trump said the congressman’s district should be investigated for all of the federal money that is invested there despite its being a “corrupt mess.”

“Why is so much money sent to the Elijah Cummings district when it is considered the worst run and most dangerous anywhere in the United States,” he asked. “No human being would want to live there. Where is all this money going? How much is stolen? Investigate this corrupt mess immediately!”:


New public school “history” book teaches students that President Trump is “mentally ill,” supporters “racist”

July 23, 2019


Source …..

The government indoctrination racket known as the public school system recently became a little more “progressive” with the addition of a new “American History” textbook published by Pearson Education, which describes President Trump as “mentally ill,” and his supporters as “racist.”

Entitled, By the People: A History of the United States, this compendium of leftist propaganda features a chapter entitled, “The Angry Election of 2016” that actually rewrites history and presents fiction as fact in an attempt to persuade students into believing that our Commander-in-Chief did not legitimately win the 2016 presidential election.

“Most thought that Trump was too extreme a candidate to win the nomination,” the chapter claims, adding, “but his extremism, his anti-establishment rhetoric, and, some said, his not very hidden racism connected with a significant number of primary voters.”

In a further attempt at shaming the president and his supporters, the author of this chapter proceeds to claim that Donald Trump’s supporters are “mostly older, often rural or suburban, and overwhelmingly white. On the other hand, the better people who support the author’s preferred candidate, Hillary Clinton, are apparently younger, non-white, and live in densely-packed urban zones.

“Clinton’s supporters feared that the election had been determined by people who were afraid of a rapidly developing ethnic diversity of the country, discomfort with their candidate’s gender and nostalgia for an earlier time in the nation’s history,” the chapter goes on to read.

Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate “survival” water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.

“They also worried about the mental stability of the president-elect and the anger that he and his supporters brought to the nation.”

For more related news, be sure to check out and

Pearson Education’s fake news “American History” textbook completely glosses over Hillary’s emails and other Clinton scandals

On the flip side, this chapter of By the People: A History of the United States makes no mention whatsoever about the reasons why many Americans were deterred from voting for Hillary Clinton, perhaps the most notable example being her 33,000 deleted emails, as well as the Uranium One scandal and the gross mismanagement of Haiti relief funds by the Clinton Foundation.

In essence, By the People: A History of the United States is basically a thinly-veiled, “Let’s bash Trump!” experiment in institutionalized Trump Derangement Syndrome – this being what passes as “public education” in America in 2019.

“It was really, really surprising to me,” Tarra Snyder, a student at Rosemount High School in Minnesota, where By the People: A History of the United States is now being used, is quoted as saying to Fox News.

Using the word “appalled” to describe her feelings upon first discovering how “blatantly biased” this textbook is, Snyder says that the purpose of education should not be to indoctrinate from a standpoint of bias, but rather to inform using truth and facts.

“I really believe that learning should be objective and that students can make their own decisions based on what they’re able to learn in a classroom, and if the facts are skewed then students aren’t able to make well-rounded decisions on what they believe,” she’s quoted as saying.

In a statement, a spokesperson from Pearson Education adamantly defended the company’s textbook against this type of criticism, claiming that its bias and bigotry against President Trump and his supporters is merely an attempt at conveying “college-level information to high school students” in order to help them meet “specific Advanced Placement standards.”

“It aims to promote debate and critical thinking by presenting multiple sides of historical issues and offering a broad survey of arguments from the 2016 presidential election and other recent topics,” the spokesperson stated.

“We have reviewed the passages in question independently and in the context of the rest of the book. This review has confirmed that the text offers a broad view of critical arguments from both sides of the 2016 presidential election.”

Sources for this article include:

Massachusetts Police Advise Criminals to ‘Hold Off’ Until Heatwave is Over

July 21, 2019

Amy Furr


Source …..

A Massachusetts police department is asking potential criminals to forgo committing any crimes until a heatwave has passed.

“Folks. Due to the extreme heat, we are asking anyone thinking of doing criminal activity to hold off until Monday,” the Braintree Police Department wrote in a Facebook post on Friday.

“It is straight up hot as soccer balls out there. Conducting criminal activity in this extreme heat is next-level henchmen status, but also very dangerous,” the post continued.

The department also encouraged residents to stay inside and enjoy other forms of entertainment until the heatwave is over.

“Stay home, blast the AC, binge Stranger Things season 3, play with the face app, practice karate in your basement. We will all meet again on Monday when it’s cooler,” the post stated.

The department concluded the post by signing it “Sincerely, The PoPo. PS: please no spoiler alerts. We’re just finishing season 2.”

Police in Malden, Massachusetts, wrote a similar post on Saturday, advising potential criminals to stay inside and out of the hot weather.

The post continued:

It is going to be extremely hot over the weekend. Malden Police is advising all criminals to stay inside until further notice. However, if you should choose to ignore the friendly advice, Malden Police officers are ready and staying hydrated to ensure that the great City of Malden is protected.

The department said the police would allow criminals to run from them if they decided to, but added that they would be following them in the comfort of their air-conditioned police cruisers.

“We may let you run in the heat for a bit, while we get closer to you in an AC equipped cruiser and plenty of water, but we’ll get you! Try to stay cool and in the pool,” the post concluded.


Betcha’ Didn’t Know: Firearm Homicides Plummeted over Last 25 Years

July 21, 2019

AWR Hawkins


Source …..

Despite endless gun violence reports put forward by the establishment media, the dirty little secret is firearm homicides have plummeted over the past 25 years.

Yet most Americans, particularly Democrats, believe firearm murders have risen period.

Washington Post analysis shows Democrats, followed closely by independents, are more apt to believe firearm murders have increased. And this feeds the Democrat psyche which is already more prone to support an expansion of gun control laws.

But the reality is that the high water mark for firearm murders was 1994 while 2017, the most recent year with complete data on incidents, shows a sharp drop. There were “16,136 [firearm murders] in 1994” but only “10,982” in 2017.

And if looked at in terms of the murder rate, instead of simply the raw murder numbers, the drop in firearm homicides is even more evident.

For example, the FBI calculated “6.2 firearm murders per 100,000 people” in 1994, while the murder rate in 2017 was 3.38. And the murder rate was even lower than 3.38 in 2014.

An interesting correlation with the drop in firearm murders is the incredible expansion of private firearm ownership. In other words, the number of privately-owned firearms was increasing at the same time that the number of firearm murders was plummeting.

On December 4, 2013, Breitbart News reported a Congressional Research Service study showing “gun ownership climbed from 192 million firearms in 1994 to 310 million firearms in 2009.” At the same time, the “firearm-related murder and non-negligent homicide” rate was cut in half over a roughly 17-year time period.


No Mocking AOC: Popular Ocasio-Cortez Parody Account Banned From Twitter; Creator Speaks Out

May 7, 2019

Amanda Prestigiacomo


Source …..

A popular Twitter account mocking Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) was hit with a permanent ban after apparently gaining too much steam on the big tech platform. The account, which clearly indicated itself as “parody” in its Twitter name, amassed over 85,000 followers before Twitter shut it down for unclear reasons.

The politico who created and manned the account, Mike Morrison, also had his personal account permanently banned. Morrison, who believes the bans were politically motivated, had nearly 60,000 followers before his seemingly unprovoked exile.

According to screenshots provided by Morrison to Human Events, Twitter acknowledges that clearly-marked parody accounts are allowed but Morrison’s content posted to the AOC parody account was apparently too similar to comments actually made by the socialist.

“You may not register or create fake and misleading accounts. While you may use Twitter pseudonymously or as a parody, commentary, or fan account, you may not use misleading account information in order to engage in spamming, abusive, or disruptive behavior, include attempts to manipulate the conversations on Twitter,” an email from Twitter said.

“You may also not ‘post duplicative or substantially similar content, replies, or mentions over multiple accounts or multiple duplicate updates on one account or create duplicate or substantially similar accounts,'” the email to Morrison added.

Human Events noted that Morrison’s mock-AOC account followed their rules with regard to online parody:

Twitter rules require all parody, newsfeed, commentary, and fan accounts to indicate “non-affiliation” in both the account name and bio. The AOC Press Release parody account used the word “parody” in both its account name and biography.

“I think Twitter banned AOC Press for the increasing amounts of attention it’s been receiving lately,” Morrison said of the ban.

“In the past month and a half alone the account grew by roughly 50,000 followers. We’ve had tweets with over 30,000 likes on them, so I think Twitter decided it was time for [the account] to go,” he claimed. “They didn’t like how popular an account created by their political opposition had become.”

Late last month, outspoken conservative and award-winning actor James Woods was locked out of his massive Twitter, which has over 2 million followers. As reported by The Daily Wire, Sarah Miller, Woods’ girlfriend, posted a screenshot of an email the actor received from Twitter, which claims Woods was locked out of his account for “violating” Twitter rules “against abusive behavior.”

“If you try to kill the King, you better not miss. #HangThemAll,” the tweet supposedly in violation from the actor said.

Keeping in line with the theme of online censorship, Facebook and Instagram (which is owned by Facebook, Inc.) permanently banned so-called “dangerous individuals and organizations” from their accounts on Thursday. Infowars founder Alex Jones, self-described investigative journalist Laura Loomer, Infowars’ Paul Joseph Watson, provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos, and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan were among those included in the de-platforming.


%d bloggers like this: