Obama-Sponsored UN Treaty Threatens Second Amendment
In 2006, the United Nations decided it was time to explore “the feasibility, scope and draft parameters for a comprehensive, legally binding instrument establishing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.”
The Bush administration voted against the creation of this proposed Arms Trade Treaty, believing that such oversight would be more productive on a national level. But on October 30th, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama reversed course, quite possibly turning the sovereignty of the United States, its Constitution and the rights of its gun owning public over to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the member states. Many believe this decision to represent a serious threat to the right of the American people to keep and bear arms.
Claiming that the UN treaty would affect only international arms trafficking, Hillary Clinton said, “conventional arms transfers are a crucial national security concern for the United States, and we have always supported effective action to control the international transfer of arms.” But former UN Ambassador John Bolton is not buying that the treaty’s aims are purely international. In an interview with NRA News, Bolton stated, “the administration is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nations, but there’s no doubt…that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.” He continued, “many of the implications of these negotiations are very much in their domestic application.”
Former congressman Bob Barr agrees with Bolton. “Even though [treaty advocates] all say ‘We are not going to involve domestic laws and the right to keep and bear arms, that won’t be affected by all this,’ that’s nonsense,” he says. “There’s no way…to ensure that firearm transfers internationally don’t fall into the hands of people that the UN doesn’t like…unless you have some sort of national regulation and national tracking.”
If the UN attempts to usurp our laws and constitution and congress can not stop it then the general public needs to do what the second amendment was writen for and that is to form a armed militia and march on Washington with the backing of our National Guards and forciably Remove the problem from office. the United States can and will not permit forign troops on our shores.
Hate to tell you this but foreign troops have been on our soil for a few years now, ie. Canadian, Mexican, Russian, Chinese and others. I can remember in the mid 70′s training alongside Iranians while serving in the U.S. Air Force at Chanute AFB, IL.
Harold
oh Lord help us.
Please forgive my typo’s and poor spelling, I was typing fast on an ipad.
Hi, I rarely ever leave comments, however this need be said:
The intent behind “Fast and Furious” was to flood the border with firearms and was designed from inception to “fail”. The Department of Justice flooded the area with hundreds of semiautomatic rifles in order to create a problem. This was going to eventually become the excuse to eliminate private firearms ownership. The gun shops used for these “supervised straw purchases” did so unwillingly. The gun shops were coerced by the DOJ to cooperate with the ATF. One of the criminal straw purchasers was arrested later for an un related crime, and was freed by Eric Holder’s Justice department.
This brings us to the UN. The UN is an organisation started by America after WWII, however for decades now has acted against American interests, and against the interest of promoting democracy. 65% of current UN members states are in fact dictatorships. This body of foreign powers has always either hated, feared; or envied America, the citicens of the United States, and the ideals upon wich our way of life has prospered. The UN wants nothing more than to lay America Low, using our creativity and American Spirit and resources to elevate their dictatorships to heightened power. They want to impose a 2.5% tax upon the American People to redistribute money to their causes. The one single thing the UN is the most afraid of, is the Second Ammendment. There can be no UN/World take over of America if they cannot deploy troops with blue berets on American Soil. If you think this sounds like a conspiracy theory, consider the following: The vote for the President Of The United States this November 6 will be tallied in Spain. The United Nations is deploying 600 officials across America to ensure the “fairness” of our vote. I feel voting should be done as fair as humanly possible, however these 600 are a literal slap in the face of the sovereignty of the citicens of this nation.
Last, I want to leave you with something I sincerely hope you look up and study. Please look up UN Agenda 21. The goal of UN Agenda 21 is the dissolution of the United States Of America. Agenda 21 was ratified in Rio in 1992. It has the ultimate goal of forcing Americans into 11 cities we are not allowed to leave. The nation itself will be broken up into 6-10 sup countries ruled by elite technocrats. Yes, I know this sounds impossible, crazy, and even impossible, however it is a real plan and is set into action. President Barrack Hussein Obama is a “citicen of the world” in his own words, and has been enacting Agenda 21 lockstep. The destruction of our currency, our second ammendment are underwayand the nullification of our fourth, sixth, and tenth ammendment rights have been taken away from us already by Executive Order. Look into the NDAA act- it’s now LAW. It was signed late at night by President Obama whyle he was on yet another vacation on December 31, 2011 and never even hit the news cycle. Indefinite detention of American Citicens, and horrible government intrusions in the name of public safety. The NDAA law was needed in order to further UN Agenda 21. If Obama is re-elected he will have the time to expand imminent domain laws and sieze private property. This too is a part of the UN plan to force the population into 11 mega cities. No, the entire US population cannot fit in 11 cities, but by the time this takes place they plan to have alot fewer of us around.