‘Social Justice’: Code Word for Anti-Americanism
1/2009
Why did 18-to-29-year-old evangelicals vote for Barack Obama despite his apostasy on the fundamental moral issues of abortion and same-sex unions? They voted 32% for Obama, twice the percentage of that demographic group who voted for John Kerry in 2004.
Many of these young people identify “social justice” as the reason that led them to relegate the prime moral issues of life and marriage to the back burner. But the term “social justice” does not define a moral cause; it is leftwing jargon to overturn those who have economic and political power.
What caused young evangelicals, the children of the so-called “religious right,” to change their moral imperatives so dramatically? Most likely it’s the attitudes and decision-making they learned in the public schools, which 89% of U.S. students attend.
The vast influence of the so-called “father of modern education,” John Dewey, had already spread disdain for objective truth and authoritative notions of good and evil. A socialist and signer of the Humanist Manifesto, Dewey viewed education as a process of socializing the child, rather than educating him to achieve his individual potential.
продам Форд-Фокус 2008 года за 200 тр. торг возможет. срочно!!!
+7 960 200 9209
Obviously, the other side of the tracks …..
We’ve tried living in harmony and peace, but all we got in return was sh!t on.
So now we may have to resort to other means in order to live as a free people!
Also, you are not entitled to any “impartial share of the benefits of society”. YOU MUST EARN IT!
Thanks for the laugh!
Social Justice is actually a secret code for “people wanting to be treated with respect and fairness”.
Anti-Americanism, on the other hand, is code for “I brand people who have a different point of view as traitors”.
Here’s an excerpt from WikiPedia’s Social Justice page:
Social justice, sometimes called civil justice, refers to the concept of a society in which justice is achieved in every aspect of society, rather than merely the administration of law.
It is generally thought of as a world which affords individuals and groups fair treatment and an impartial share of the benefits of society. (Different proponents of social justice have developed different interpretations of what constitutes fair treatment and an impartial share.)
It can also refer to the distribution of advantages and disadvantages within a society.
Respectfully,
Michael